# AccretionLink: On-Device Auditing of Exposure-Control Attacks on Attribute Inference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14735 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14735/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07298/) (2023)
- [Estimating means of bounded random variables by betting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09686/) (2020)
- [Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01948/) (2022)
- [EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20354/) (2025)
- [AttriGuard: A Practical Defense Against Attribute Inference Attacks via Adversarial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04810/) (2018)
- [A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07217/) (2024)
- [You are Who You Know and How You Behave: Attribute Inference Attacks via Users' Social Friends and Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05893/) (2016)
- [The Eye of Sherlock Holmes: Uncovering User Private Attribute Profiling via Vision-Language Model Agentic Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19139/) (2025)
- [What Your Posts Reveal: A Benchmark and Agentic Framework for User-Level Privacy Leakage on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06784/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Exposure control lets an adversary rank authentic public posts to strengthen private-attribute inference without altering content. AccretionLink defines confidentiality and integrity games for this attack, models bounded selection odds through partial identification, and constructs dependence-aware time-uniform e-processes. On 52 held-out synthetic profiles, odds-four selection reduced aggregate negative log likelihood at every horizon. At eight posts the advantage was 0.01595 nats (95% CI [0.00890, 0.02336]), three of four target effects survived Holm adjustment, and label-blind model-guided selection caused 6/109 high-confidence false reversals. On 142 PAN15 test profiles, exploratory selection produced a 0.01227-nat advantage but no reversal. A separate TF-IDF selector retained a 0.01470-nat advantage against the unchanged G5 target, while matched identity shuffling did not reproduce it. Pixel 10 encoded all 1,622 held-out posts once with a fallback-free Tensor G5 graph. A P-256 checkpoint authenticated the selected-replay, actual-model, native-report, and operation digests; local KeyInfo identified the signing key as StrongBox-backed.