# Batch-wise Adaptive Pruning: Periodic Neuron Activation-Aware Weight Pruning for Language Reasoning Model

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14003 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14003/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11695/) (2023)
- [LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11627/) (2023)
- [Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06694/) (2023)
- [SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columns](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15024/) (2024)
- [tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14992/) (2024)
- [Deja Vu: Contextual Sparsity for Efficient LLMs at Inference Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17157/) (2023)
- [Shortened LLaMA: Depth Pruning for Large Language Models with Comparison of Retraining Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02834/) (2024)
- [Training-Free Activation Sparsity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14690/) (2024)
- [R-KV: Redundancy-aware KV Cache Compression for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24133/) (2025)
- [ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13516/) (2024)
- [CATS: Contextually-Aware Thresholding for Sparsity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08763/) (2024)
- [Prompt-prompted Adaptive Structured Pruning for Efficient LLM Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01365/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks through extended chain-of-thought generation, but incur substantial computational costs during inference. In production settings, batched inference is essential for high throughput, yet the existing training-free adaptive pruning methods we evaluate severely degrade in this regime. Because a batch must share a single pruning mask, these methods aggregate activations across samples and then apply threshold-based selection; the threshold, calibrated offline on unaggregated activations, no longer matches the aggregated distribution, so the realized sparsity ratio drifts and accuracy on reasoning tasks collapses under batched inference. In this work, we propose a training-free adaptive pruning method designed specifically for batched inference in LRMs, built on two components. First, we replace threshold-based selection with periodic top-k selection over the aggregated importance scores, which is unaffected by the shift that aggregation induces in the activation distribution, and which runs selection once per update period rather than at every token, preserving the speedup. Second, based on the observation that important neurons re-fire periodically during long reasoning generation, we introduce an activation memory that accumulates importance across update phases so that recurring neurons are retained. Experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art adaptive pruning method by 39.7 percentage points in average accuracy at batch size 4 with 50% target sparsity on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, and reaches 1.40x speedup over dense inference at 50% actual sparsity.