# Consensus-gated Multi-Agent Neural Architecture Search for Seismic Fault Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13889 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13889/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03144/) (2016)
- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05587/) (2017)
- [DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.09055/) (2018)
- [Group Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08494/) (2018)
- [Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01578/) (2016)
- [Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.03999/) (2018)
- [Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01548/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12931/) (2023)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [EvoPrompting: Language Models for Code-Level Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14838/) (2023)
- [Strip Pooling: Rethinking Spatial Pooling for Scene Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13328/) (2020)
- [LLMatic: Neural Architecture Search via Large Language Models and Quality Diversity Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01102/) (2023)
- [A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07659/) (2019)
- [A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08585/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks for seismic fault segmentation are often borrowed from computer vision and medical imaging domains where they train under relatively much larger labeled data resources. Optimizing their architecture under tight labeled data budgets as are common in geophysical applications is not a trivial problem. Manually designing data-optimal architectures is time-consuming while classical neural architecture search (NAS) is restricted to hand-crafted search spaces and large compute budgets. We present an agentic NAS system in which a panel of three large language models (Claude, GPT-5.1, and Gemini~2.5~Pro) debates each candidate architecture to unanimous consensus, authors the complete PyTorch implementation, cross-reviews it, and submits it to an automated validate-train-score loop with a hard 450K parameter budget, keep-or-revert lineage, and a memory of failed mechanisms. Operating on source code rather than a predefined operation menu, the search ran on a single consumer GPU and trained only eight candidates. It discovered ours: a 425K-parameter encoder-decoder with a strip-pooling bottleneck, squeeze-and-excitation gating, an asymmetric one-conv decoder, and a feature-pyramid fusion neck. Trained under a protocol identical to all baselines on sections derived from the Thebe fault dataset, it attains the highest F1 (0.578) and IoU of all models tested while being the smallest, outperforming a published-capacity U-Net (31M parameters, F1 0.484), DeepLabV3-ResNet50 (39.6M, 0.516), an Attention U-Net(1.83M, 0.502). The search cost 101 LLM calls (~1.15M input / 0.39M output tokens) and roughly one GPU-day, making consensus-gated LLM panels a practical, low-cost route to domain-specific architecture discovery.