# Depth-Aware Sensitivity Analysis of Mixture-of-Experts Models via Magnitude-Based Expert Masking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13565 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13565/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [MoE large language models](https://mlsanity.com/moe/moe-large-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.00149/) (2015)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06066/) (2024)
- [To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.01878/) (2017)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [ST-MoE: Designing Stable and Transferable Sparse Expert Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08906/) (2022)
- [Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14800/) (2024)
- [XLCoST: A Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08474/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale large language models (LLMs) while preserving computational efficiency through sparse activation. Despite their widespread adoption, the relative importance of individual MoE layers remains insufficiently characterized, particularly for model compression. This paper presents a systematic layer-wise sensitivity analysis of the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model (40 MoE layers, 256 experts per layer, top-8 routing) using magnitude-based expert masking on the XLCoST cross-lingual code translation benchmark. We conduct a multi-phase study spanning 100, 300, and 500 prompt evaluation scales across three H100 GPU servers. Our central finding is that layer sensitivity is strongly depth-dependent: early layers (0-9) and middle layers (10-29) are highly fragile to expert masking, while late layers (30-39), and especially very-late layers (35-39), tolerate aggressive masking of low-magnitude experts. Flat all-layer masking at 30% retains only 150/300 Good+Similar outputs at 300-prompt scale, whereas late-focused policies retain 249-255/300 while masking 640-1,145 experts. On a later 500-prompt held-out validation slice, the narrow very-late policy (layers 35-39 @ 50%) achieves the strongest quality/masked-expert tradeoff among tested candidates, retaining 419/500 Good+Similar outputs while masking only 640 of 10,240 total experts. We additionally characterize top-k routing width reduction from 8 to 6 active experts per token, which shows a large observed wall-clock reduction on a 100-prompt probe with no Good+Similar loss, though it does not yet compose cleanly with aggressive expert masking. These findings provide an empirical foundation for depth-aware MoE expert masking and establish a practical path toward physical weight surgery, activation-based expert scoring, and training-based recovery.