# Teach the Magnitude, Not the Direction: Verifier-Bounded Credit Assignment for Multi-Turn Multi-step LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13179 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13179/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 34 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06120/) (2025)
- [ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11536/) (2025)
- [RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20073/) (2025)
- [ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13958/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13016/) (2026)
- [Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19897/) (2026)
- [ToRL: Scaling Tool-Integrated RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23383/) (2025)
- [A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00626/) (2026)
- [Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25562/) (2026)
- [Self-Distilled RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03128/) (2026)
- [Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24472/) (2026)
- [Privileged Information Distillation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04942/) (2026)
- [Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Fine-Grained Reward Structure and Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11821/) (2025)
- [Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15155/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [RetireOPD: Self-Retiring On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20784/) (2026)
- [Eliciting Weak-to-Strong Generalization with On-Policy Reverse Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08798/) (2026)
- [Critical-State RL: Diagnosing Trainable States for Multi-Turn Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24985/) (2026)
- [GraphOPD: Graph-Augmented On-Policy Distillation for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08959/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) offers a verifier-bounded performance ceiling for training multi-turn tool-use agents, yet its trajectory-level credit assignment conflates heterogeneous per-turn outcomes into a single reward signal. On-policy distillation provides dense per-token supervision but is either teacher-bounded or prone to gradient concentration collapse. We introduce CrEST, a hierarchical credit assignment framework that retains RL's verifier-bounded ceiling while incorporating dense token-level signals from a privileged self-teacher. CrEST resolves credit at two levels: turn-segmented verified advantages address inter-turn dilution, while entropy-gated self-teacher modulation refines intra-turn token contributions. Experiments on BFCL V3 and WildToolBench show that CrEST consistently outperforms both RL and distillation baselines across two model scales, with the largest gains on long-trajectory and strict session-level metrics. Our work demonstrates that the teacher's role in policy optimization can be reduced from determining update directions to modulating update magnitudes, unlocking dense credit assignment without sacrificing the verifier-bounded ceiling.