# Small Language Model enabled Autonomous agent for Language-Conditioned Cognitive Radar

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11596 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11596/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern radar systems require adapting their processing strategies in response to changing interference, clutter, and data availability. This paper introduces a framework for a small language model (SLM)-driven autonomous agent designed for language-conditioned cognitive radar, functioning as an intelligent controller for a suite of array signal processing tools. Given a natural-language command, the agent extracts radar-operation-related cues, selects an appropriate sequence of signal-processing methods, configures parameters, and invokes executable tools for numerical computation. Experiments with a synthetic uniform linear array (ULA) radar demonstrate that, given a natural-language command, the agent performs meaningful algorithm selection across diverse scenarios for sidelobe control, jammer suppression, multiple-null beamforming, coherent-source handling, and low-snapshot direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation. Ablation results show that radar-specific prompting and physics-grounded tool execution are both required for reliable decisions and hallucination-free numerical results.