# VIScore: Diagnosing Planning-Relevant Quality in Latent World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11174 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11174/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Latent predictive world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/latent-predictive-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19312/) (2026)
- [Hierarchical Planning with Latent World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03208/) (2026)
- [Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07278/) (2026)
- [Subspace-Decomposed JEPAs: Disentangling Progression and Content in Latent World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31111/) (2026)
- [INTACT: Isomorphic Intent-to-Action Learning for Search-Free World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26056/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Beyond Task Success: Stage-Wise Reliability of World Model Planning under Sensing Degradation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07126/) (2026)
- [Beyond a single latent space: a dual-latent world model for long-horizon planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37644/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Regulating the latent space to an isotropic Gaussian distribution provides a stable and information-maximized landscape for world model planning. However, the latent space property and successful planning remain disconnected. We first study this by comparing SIGReg and VISReg, two regularization loss functions with the same distribution target but different properties. Compared with SIGReg, VISReg has more flexibility in controlling the weights of center, scale, and shape regularization, and a larger batch size brings a finer distribution approximation. We find that the former, despite being beneficial in self-supervised learning (SSL), does not help the planning, whereas the latter improves the planning success on out-of-domain (OOD) datasets. This motivates a deep understanding of the factors that correlate with the success rate. Unlike the previous metrics focusing on the encoded latent only, we propose the Veracity-Influence-Sobriety score (VIScore), a metric that quantifies the reachability and capacity of a predictor given the encoded feature, and the hallucination of the searching-based planner. Compared with straightness, physical-state probing, and empowerment, we show that, with the measurement covering encoder, predictor, and planner, VIScore explains the success rate better than the others, as reflected by a strong Spearman correlation. Specifically, VIScore consistently achieves a Spearman correlation over 0.75 on both seen and unseen models and datasets on the cross-task success rate pool. Moreover, VIScore is the only metric that has a calibration error below the constant fit across all testing scenarios, showcasing the importance of these three aspects in planning success. We hope this metric can help future studies on world model design and diagnosis.