# A Cost-Efficient Routing Pipeline for Multilingual Short-Text Classification Using Small Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10939 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10939/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.11080/) (2020)
- [Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01852/) (2020)
- [Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10464/) (2018)
- [DeeBERT: Dynamic Early Exiting for Accelerating BERT Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12993/) (2020)
- [Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10668/) (2021)
- [InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07834/) (2020)
- [XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07412/) (2021)
- [SIB-200: A Simple, Inclusive, and Big Evaluation Dataset for Topic Classification in 200+ Languages and Dialects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07445/) (2023)
- [MASSIVE: A 1M-Example Multilingual Natural Language Understanding Dataset with 51 Typologically-Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08582/) (2022)
- [Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04721/) (2020)
- [Revisiting Machine Translation for Cross-lingual Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14240/) (2023)
- [VECO: Variable and Flexible Cross-lingual Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.16046/) (2020)
- [T3L: Translate-and-Test Transfer Learning for Cross-Lingual Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04996/) (2023)
- [Can Embedding Similarity Predict Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Systematic Study on African Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03168/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Discovering Translation-Worthy Languages with E-Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06593/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual short-text classification supports operational systems such as content moderation, customer support routing, and intent recognition, yet aggregate evaluation often hides large differences between high-resource and low-resource languages. Uniform inference policies are simple to deploy, but they assume that all languages are equally well served. In this work, we evaluate a fixed-list routing strategy that keeps stronger languages on a direct multilingual path and selectively sends weaker languages through translation into English before zero-shot classification. The pipeline is fully self-hosted, uses pretrained compact sentence encoders, and requires no task-specific fine-tuning. We test the approach on two benchmarks chosen to differ in scale and label granularity: a 15-language subset of SIB-200 for seven-way topic classification and a 15-locale subset of MASSIVE for intent classification over an official 60-intent inventory. On SIB-200, the best overall configuration is R1, which translates only the low-resource tier: high-tier and mid-tier Macro-F1 remain unchanged, while low-tier Macro-F1 rises from 0.4632 to 0.6828. On the MASSIVE subset, the same low-tier intervention raises low-tier Macro-F1 from 0.2143 to 0.4417, but the best overall result is obtained by full translation, R3, at Macro-F1 0.4647. Across these two benchmarks, selective translation is a reliable intervention for weaker languages, whereas the optimal routing boundary depends on the task. We therefore report routing through tier-level quality gains and tier-level latency rather than a single global efficiency score.