# When Vision Becomes Text: Visual Token Pruning via Cross-Modal Residual Guidance in VLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10489 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10489/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Visual token pruning in multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/inference/visual-token-pruning-in-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03378/) (2023)
- [mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14178/) (2023)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17247/) (2024)
- [Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11494/) (2025)
- [Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10967/) (2025)
- [Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02912/) (2025)
- [Variation-aware Vision Token Dropping for Faster Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01552/) (2025)
- [SCOPE: Saliency-Coverage Oriented Token Pruning for Efficient Multimodel LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24214/) (2025)
- [TRIO: Token Reduction via Inference-Objective Guidance for Efficient Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04657/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CoViST: Visual Token Compression via Composable States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33397/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Abundant visual information strengthens vision-language model (VLM) perception, yet massive visual tokens raise inference costs. Existing visual token pruning methods rely on similarity-based guidance, which exploits pairwise text-vision and vision-vision token correlations for compression. However, such methods only capture local layer-level signals and overlook the whole inference process in VLM. In this paper, we revisit VLM inference and present a new efficient guidance scheme that complements similarity-based guidance. In particular, we identify a key observation: as LLM layers deepen, text tokens continuously aggregate visual information via self-attention and progressively absorb partial visual content into textual representations. To quantify this phenomenon, we propose Cross Modal Absorption (CMA) from a geometric representation perspective to measure how much visual information is absorbed by text, revealing that more visual tokens in deeper layers can be approximately explained by the text subspace. We accordingly propose Cross Modal Residual (CMR). It projects visual tokens onto the text subspace via Tikhonov regularized least squares and exploits reconstruction residuals to quantify visual information that cannot be explained by text. Finally, based on CMR, we present SIEVE, a training-free visual token compression method that combines CMR, text-attention relevance, and residual-space diversity to retain task-relevant and complementary tokens. Experiments on diverse VLM architectures verify the effectiveness of SIEVE. For instance, on LLaVA-NeXT-7B, SIEVE keeps only 11.1% of visual tokens while preserving 97.5% of the original average performance, achieving 3.62× prefill speedup, 2.49× end-to-end speedup, and a 6.02× KV-cache reduction.