# Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10327 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10327/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Human values and AI feedback alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/human-values-and-ai-feedback-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08239/) (2022)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06987/) (2023)
- [Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09768/) (2020)
- [Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07871/) (2018)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03137/) (2016)
- [AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19852/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15590/) (2021)
- [Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10075/) (2024)
- [Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08358/) (2023)
- [MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08925/) (2024)
- [RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08555/) (2024)
- [Personalisation within bounds: A risk taxonomy and policy framework for the alignment of large language models with personalised feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05453/) (2023)
- [Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02030/) (2024)
- [Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16960/) (2023)
- [Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08640/) (2025)
- [ETA: Evaluating Then Aligning Safety of Vision Language Models at Inference Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06625/) (2024)
- [Randomness, Not Representation: The Unreliability of Evaluating Cultural Alignment in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08688/) (2025)
- [Offline Regularised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19107/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Bradley-Terry Models in Preference-Based Reward Modeling: Foundations, Theory, and Alternatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04991/) (2024)
- [Self-Alignment of Large Language Models via Monopolylogue-based Social Scene Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05699/) (2024)
- [Assessment of Multimodal Large Language Models in Alignment with Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17830/) (2024)
- [Online Merging Optimizers for Boosting Rewards and Mitigating Tax in Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17931/) (2024)
- [Hybrid Preferences: Learning to Route Instances for Human vs. AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19133/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Can AI systems be aligned to human values? The popularization of large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal foundation models has seen a rise in harms spanning from toxic speech and hallucinations to AI agents executing unauthorized actions. Within the field of AI safety, these harmful instances are often framed as the alignment problem, or of models being misaligned with human values. Researchers have responded by pursuing applied and theoretical AI value alignment efforts, often without specifying what they mean by human values. How does the field of AI value alignment conceive of human values? How are these conceptions of values technically operationalized and evaluated? What does the emergent theory of value from this field signify for the future of AI? We annotated 94 value alignment research papers to discern their implicit theory of values in AI. The majority do not define values, relying heavily on preferences as a stand in that runs the risk of reducing complex culturally situated concepts down to binary choices. As researchers dispense with using human annotators for model training and evaluation, turning instead to synthetic data and autorater approaches to aligning and evaluating models, we identify the potential to close off alternative methods for contesting and enacting values in foundation models. In making AI value alignments philosophical commitments explicit, we seek to bring great specificity and under explored perspectives in the debate on whether and how AI can address human values.