# From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutch

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09925 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09925/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02243/) (2019)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00133/) (2020)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09700/) (2019)
- [Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02446/) (2023)
- [MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12528/) (2023)
- [The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01768/) (2023)
- [Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04261/) (2024)
- [BERTje: A Dutch BERT Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09582/) (2019)
- [RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06286/) (2020)
- [INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19799/) (2024)
- [Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00698/) (2025)
- [MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07243/) (2024)
- [Encoder vs Decoder: Comparative Analysis of Encoder and Decoder Language Models on Multilingual NLU Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13469/) (2024)
- [BeHonest: Benchmarking Honesty in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13261/) (2024)
- [GermanPartiesQA: Benchmarking Commercial Large Language Models and AI Companions for Political Alignment and Sycophancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18008/) (2024)
- [Uncovering Political Bias in Large Language Models using Parliamentary Voting Records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08785/) (2026)
- [DUMB: A Benchmark for Smart Evaluation of Dutch Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13026/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts. We present the "Grip on LLMs" framework, a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental use developed in collaboration with domain experts from a major Dutch municipal organisation. Through an advisory board process, user research, and a survey of the users of a civil-servant chatbot, we identify six evaluation dimensions (factuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency) and operationalise them into a benchmark suite covering more than 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models. Our results reveal that no single model excels across all dimensions, and that trade-offs are unavoidable: higher quality consistently comes at greater environmental impact and financial cost, while bias remains largely independent of both. We further find that factuality (whether a model answers correctly) and honesty (whether a model acknowledges what it does not know) are governed by distinct properties, with high factuality not implying high honesty. To make these findings actionable for non-technical audiences, we release a publicly accessible, user-friendly model overview designed for the full range of stakeholders involved in governmental LLM selection, from engineers to policymakers.