# RAVEN-Eval: Rubric-Guided Automatic Evaluation for AI Video Generation Models Based on LMM Preference Judgement

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09111 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09111/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17982/) (2023)
- [EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11440/) (2023)
- [VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15252/) (2024)
- [T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14505/) (2024)
- [Seedance 2.0: Advancing Video Generation for World Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14148/) (2026)
- [VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06800/) (2025)
- [Seedance 1.5 pro: A Native Audio-Visual Joint Generation Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13507/) (2025)
- [Video-Bench: Human-Aligned Video Generation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04907/) (2025)
- [VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13503/) (2024)
- [AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17221/) (2024)
- [Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.25996/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI video generation has advanced rapidly and entered widespread commercial use. As a result, quality differences among videos produced by state-of-the-art AI video generation models~(AIVGMs) have become increasingly difficult to discern using conventional evaluation criteria, such as visual fidelity and semantic instruction following. Meanwhile, human evaluation now requires more expertise and sustained attention, substantially increasing annotation costs. This calls for automated evaluation that can reliably distinguish fine-grained differences among advanced AIVGMs with minimal human intervention. To address this challenge, we present RAVEN-Eval, a rubric-guided automated evaluation framework for AIVGMs, built primarily on the LMM-as-a-judge paradigm. Through an automatic task curation and quality-filtering pipeline, RAVEN-Eval curates 150 text-to-video~(T2V) tasks and 100 image-to-video~(I2V) tasks, and systematically collects more than 4,500 AIGVs. At its core, RAVEN-Eval adopts rubric-guided automated LMM preference judgement, in which LMM judges conduct pairwise comparisons according to task-specific rubrics. It further introduces an anchor-based model insertion approach to reduce the evaluation cost of incorporating new models. Finally, we evaluate 20 high-performance AIVGMs, as well as the judging capabilities of 13 LMM judges, and establish the RAVEN-Eval Leaderboards. Overall, RAVEN-Eval paves a scalable path for automatic and trustworthy evaluation of rapidly evolving AIVGMs.