# Model the Edit, Not the Image: Visual Autoregressive Editing from a Source-Centric Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09057 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09057/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02905/) (2024)
- [Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05328/) (2016)
- [Autoregressive Model Beats Diffusion: Llama for Scalable Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06525/) (2024)
- [DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11427/) (2022)
- [FlowEdit: Inversion-Free Text-Based Editing Using Pre-Trained Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08629/) (2024)
- [Taming Rectified Flow for Inversion and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04746/) (2024)
- [Direct Inversion: Boosting Diffusion-based Editing with 3 Lines of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01506/) (2023)
- [Training-Free Text-Guided Image Editing with Visual Autoregressive Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23897/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Next-scale visual autoregressive models (VARs) have emerged as a powerful generative paradigm, producing high-quality images through efficient coarse-to-fine prediction. However, their potential for text-guided image editing remains largely underexplored. Existing training-free VAR editing approaches often formulate editing as target-conditioned regeneration guided or constrained by the source image, and may rely on inversion, test-time optimization, attention control, or user-provided masks. This generation-centric formulation does not fully exploit the multiscale source representations provided by VARs and may introduce additional computation or intervention. We instead take a source-centric perspective on VAR editing, in which the encoded source image tokens serve as the primary visual state and the editing process focuses on condition-induced changes. Based on this perspective, we propose EditMod, which compares source- and target-conditioned predictions under a shared autoregressive context, treats their difference as a scale-wise editing direction, and applies it as a residual update to source tokens at selected scales. Experiments show that EditMod achieves leading source-image fidelity while maintaining strong text alignment, and completes end-to-end editing of a 1K image in only 1.57 seconds on a single A100 GPU without per-image preparation.
