# Gaming Without an Attacker: Benchmark Fingerprinting in LLM-Driven Search Under Selection Pressure

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08722 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08722/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10811/) (2019)
- [AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13131/) (2025)
- [NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18018/) (2023)
- [Strategic Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06980/) (2015)
- [Defining and Characterizing Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.13085/) (2022)
- [Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.04585/) (2018)
- [Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02513/) (2015)
- [The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03453/) (2018)
- [The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.04585/) (2015)
- [Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.1228/) (2014)
- [Preventing False Discovery in Interactive Data Analysis is Hard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1408.1655/) (2014)
- [Training on the Test Task Confounds Evaluation and Emergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07890/) (2024)
- [Metal-Sci: A Scientific Compute Benchmark for Evolutionary LLM Kernel Search on Apple Silicon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09708/) (2026)
- [Discovering Cooperative Pipelines: Autoresearch for Sequential Social Dilemmas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30003/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Benchmarks for systems that are optimized against the evaluation signal measure something different from what they claim. We document this concretely in two GPU-kernel-optimization suites with held-out generalization gates: Metal-Sci (10 scientific-compute tasks) and Metal-ZK (12 zero-knowledge/cryptographic tasks), in which three frontier LLMs (Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.5) propose Metal kernels inside a (1+1) evolutionary loop with rich feedback. Although no model is prompted to act adversarially, the promoted winners repeatedly fingerprint the evaluation configuration: they branch on the identity of runtime parameters, tune the measured branch maximally, and leave the unmeasured branch slow or silently wrong. Across the pooled suites, 16/53 (30%) of in-distribution wins fail to transfer to held-out configurations. We give a four-mode taxonomy of these failures, from configuration fingerprints to gate leakage. We distill design guidance for measurement under strategic optimization: held-out probes retain validity only on non-enumerable axes; gates must measure held-out performance, not just correctness; and a transfer rate is interpretable only with per-failure mechanism grades: ours decomposes into gamed, overfit, and benign. Code and research artifacts: https://github.com/vicgalle/kernel-fingerprinting
