# REIN: Bridging the Gap between Reasoning and Reliability via Reflection and Abstention Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07931 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07931/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12773/) (2023)
- [Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01825/) (2023)
- [Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18349/) (2024)
- [Empowering LLMs with Logical Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15652/) (2025)
- [TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25760/) (2025)
- [KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factuality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19807/) (2025)
- [R1-Code-Interpreter: LLMs Reason with Code via Supervised and Multi-stage Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21668/) (2025)
- [Scaling Physical Reasoning with the PHYSICS Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00022/) (2025)
- [DualBreach: Efficient Dual-Jailbreaking via Target-Driven Initialization and Multi-Target Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18564/) (2025)
- [BARREL: Boundary-Aware Reasoning for Factual and Reliable LRMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13529/) (2025)
- [DataShield: Uncovering Risky Fine-Tuning Data Across LLMs Through Consensus Subspace Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.15081/) (2026)
- [Dynamic Jailbreaking Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02422/) (2025)
- [From Topology to Behavioral Semantics: Enhancing BGP Security by Understanding BGP's Language with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14467/) (2025)
- [BAPO: Boundary-Aware Policy Optimization for Reliable Agentic Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11037/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Hallucination Across the Reasoning Lifecycle: Interface Visibility, Causal Evidence, and Release Control in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05472/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) are prone to hallucination, which undermines their reliability and poses challenges for safe deployment. Hallucinations in LRMs arise from two distinct failure sources: reasoning hallucination, where flawed inference steps propagate to an incorrect conclusion, and knowledge hallucination, where the model lacks the requisite factual knowledge to answer the query. To address reasoning hallucination, we propose REIN, an alignment framework that trains LRMs to produce a structured reasoning sequence, texttt<think> rightarrow texttt<reflection> rightarrow texttt<answer>, enabling explicit self-reflection before committing to a final answer. To address knowledge hallucination, REIN introduces a reward mechanism that encourages explicit abstention (e.g., "I don't know") when none of the sampled reasoning chains yields a correct answer, allowing the model to refrain from unsupported predictions. Extensive evaluations on mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks show that REIN consistently improves selective accuracy, reduces incorrect-but-self-endorsed responses, and maintains high coverage compared with competitive baselines. Notably, REIN achieves these gains within a single forward pass, without requiring process supervision, inference-time controllers, external search, or multi-round critiques. Experiments on multiple backbones show that REIN reduces the hallucination proxy by 58~72% relative to the base models while maintaining 86~91% average coverage, and improves selective accuracy on attempted questions by 6.6~14.2%.