# CONFER: Conflict-Aware Evidence Negotiation for Regime-Calibrated Weak Supervision in Multimodal Emotion Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07867 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07867/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04977/) (2017)
- [Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04712/) (2018)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07836/) (2018)
- [Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01768/) (2018)
- [DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07394/) (2020)
- [Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00295/) (2019)
- [Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06112/) (2019)
- [Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07250/) (2017)
- [Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00151/) (2020)
- [MISA: Modality-Invariant and -Specific Representations for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03545/) (2020)
- [Learning Modality-Specific Representations with Self-Supervised Multi-Task Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04830/) (2021)
- [Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11423/) (2022)
- [Trusted Multi-View Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02051/) (2021)
- [FuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03226/) (2024)
- [M3ER: Multiplicative Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Facial, Textual, and Speech Cues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05659/) (2019)
- [I2MoE: Interpretable Multimodal Interaction-aware Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19190/) (2025)
- [CMW-Net: Learning a Class-Aware Sample Weighting Mapping for Robust Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05613/) (2022)
- [Multimodal Learning with Uncertainty Quantification based on Discounted Belief Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18024/) (2024)
- [Navigating Conflicting Views: Harnessing Trust for Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00958/) (2024)
- [Sample Selection via Contrastive Fragmentation for Noisy Label Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17771/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict. We propose CONFER, a graph-based conflict-aware evidence negotiation framework for weakly supervised multimodal emotion recognition. CONFER represents each modality expert as a node with a predictive belief, boundary-based uncertainty, and runtime reliability estimated from historical out-of-fold performance and current-sample uncertainty. Uncertainty-aware compatibility and reliability-directed asymmetric edge weights govern iterative message-passing negotiation, followed by peer-supported prediction readout. Conflict reduction, residual disagreement, and mean modality uncertainty further characterize three regimes---Consensus, Dissent, and Ambiguity---for sample-specific weak-label calibration. We evaluate CONFER on AMIGOS, MAHNOB-HCI, and DEAP under subject-dependent 10-fold and strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocols. CONFER achieves competitive performance, reaching 0.873 accuracy on AMIGOS-V and 0.854 accuracy on MAHNOB-V under strict LOSO evaluation. Further analyses show larger negotiation gains on high-conflict samples and improved robustness to weak-label corruption, indicating that cross-modal conflict provides useful information for both directional modality coordination and supervision-reliability estimation.