# From Survey Personas to LLM Agents: A Generative Agent-based Simulation of Mobility Policy Preference Dynamics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07519 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07519/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [RoleLLM: Benchmarking, Eliciting, and Enhancing Role-Playing Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00746/) (2023)
- [Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02503/) (2021)
- [From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03563/) (2024)
- [Simulating Cooperative Prosocial Behavior with Multi-Agent LLMs: Evidence and Mechanisms for AI Agents to Inform Policy Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12504/) (2025)
- [Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3475/) (2013)
- [How Personality Traits Influence Negotiation Outcomes? A Simulation based on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11549/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Behavioral Alignment in Conflict Dialogue: A Multi-Dimensional Comparison of LLM Agents and Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16394/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used to simulate socially complex and interaction-driven tasks. However, most existing studies rely on hand-crafted personas. Since persona design strongly shapes how agents interpret context and make decisions, developing empirically grounded agent profiles is a significant aspect in this underexplored research area. To address this limitation, we propose a survey-grounded generative agent-based modeling (GABM) simulation framework that translates real survey respondents into generative LLM agents. The main objective of our framework is to demonstrate how careful persona design enables realistic simulation of decision-making using LLMs for facilitating behavioral experiments. We illustrate the framework's applicability through a case study of mobility policy preference dynamics in Germany, focusing on public support for phasing out new internal combustion engine vehicles, which is part of the European Union's net-zero target. Our benchmark is based on 514 survey respondents, each translated into a natural-language persona, grounded in demographic characteristics, political orientation, mobility behavior, fuel experience, and climate-related attitudes. The simulation goal is to examine how support evolves over time, how agents switch positions across rounds, and how responses differ across survey-grounded personas under changing social and policy contexts.