# Does More Retrieved Evidence Help Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Diffusion Language Models?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07006 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07006/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-robustness-and-adaptive-retrieval/)
- Diffusion models / [Discrete and text diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/discrete-and-text-diffusion/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03006/) (2021)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01282/) (2020)
- [Argmax Flows and Multinomial Diffusion: Learning Categorical Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05379/) (2021)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [VisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10594/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09210/) (2023)
- [LLaDA-V: Large Language Diffusion Models with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16933/) (2025)
- [General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14652/) (2025)
- [ParallelBench: Understanding the Trade-offs of Parallel Decoding in Diffusion LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04767/) (2025)
- [Dream-VL & Dream-VLA: Open Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models with Diffusion Language Model Backbone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22615/) (2025)
- [InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19028/) (2025)
- [Controllable Logical Hypothesis Generation for Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20948/) (2025)
- [Unifying Deductive and Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs with Masked Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11462/) (2025)
- [SING: Synthetic Intention Graph for Scalable Active Tool Discovery in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16591/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Visual retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) commonly expands the retrieved evidence set to improve answer-page coverage, implicitly assuming that all available evidence should be passed to the generator. We show that this assumption does not hold for diffusion language models (DLMs): retrieving more pages increases answer-page recall, whereas unconditionally passing all retrieved pages to the generator often reduces answer accuracy, primarily because of semantic conflict. A latent-source analysis explains this mismatch through source-coherence loss in parallel denoising, where position-wise proposals can combine incompatible visual sources into unsupported answers. We further find that such interference is already visible in the first-step answer-block distribution, making it possible to assess evidence before decoding. To preserve retrieval coverage while limiting harmful visual exposure, we propose the Entropy-Based Candidate Filter (ECF), a training-free evidence-admission framework. To reduce irrelevant content within individual candidates, ECF constructs multi-granularity evidence units; to identify beneficial additional evidence, it uses blank-controlled block confidence and retrieval rank to determine whether and which candidate should enter the final context. Across three multimodal DLMs and five visual QA benchmarks, ECF improves answer accuracy by 2.62 percentage points on average over the strongest fixed top-k input and, with LLaDA2.0-Uni, by 2.37 percentage points on average over the best competing training-free result for each dataset. These results show that broader retrieval benefits visual DLM-RAG through selective evidence admission rather than unconditional evidence expansion. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/wjkuser/ECF.