# Progressive Alignment of Recommender Foundation Model through Multi-Phase Post-Training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06792 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06792/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/preference-alignment-for-recommenders-and-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09781/) (2018)
- [Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.10054/) (2022)
- [Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06939/) (2015)
- [An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08747/) (2023)
- [Recommender Systems with Generative Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05065/) (2023)
- [Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17152/) (2024)
- [Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semantics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07400/) (2020)
- [ESCM2: Entire Space Counterfactual Multi-Task Model for Post-Click Conversion Rate Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05125/) (2022)
- [Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05386/) (2025)
- [Scaling Law of Large Sequential Recommendation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11351/) (2023)
- [External Large Foundation Model: How to Efficiently Serve Trillions of Parameters for Online Ads Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17494/) (2025)
- [An Unified Search and Recommendation Foundation Model for Cold-Start Scenario](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08939/) (2023)
- [RankFormer: Listwise Learning-to-Rank Using Listwide Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05808/) (2023)
- [PinFM: Foundation Model for User Activity Sequences at a Billion-scale Visual Discovery Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.12704/) (2025)
- [Realizing Scaling Laws in Recommender Systems: A Foundation-Expert Paradigm for Hyperscale Model Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02929/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation model(FM) for recommendation has shown strong ability to model long-horizon sequential user behavior. In practice, a single pretrained foundation model is often adapted to diverse downstream serving surfaces through Supervised Fine-Tuning(SFT). However, optimizing task-specific objectives such as clicks or likes does not necessarily align the serving policy with the business metrics that determine recommendation quality. We propose a three-phase progressive post-training framework that explicitly separates downstream adaptation from business-metric alignment. The adaptation stage is decomposed into Linear Probing(LP) and Full Fine-Tuning(FFT): LP first stabilizes randomly initialized downstream heads within a frozen pretrained representation space, and FFT then jointly specializes the full model for the target task. On top of this stabilized policy, Reinforcement Fine-Tuning(RFT) aligns the model with practical business objectives using a learned reward model. Rather than directly optimizing the serving policy on sparse business targets, we train the policy on dense implicit feedback and use business-metric supervision only for reward modeling. Offline experiments show that the progressive LP-FFT-RFT framework outperforms single-phase alternatives, and that reward-based alignment yields a stronger serving policy than directly using the reward model itself for ranking. Large-scale online A/B tests further show that the proposed framework improves production recommendation quality over a conventional non-foundation baseline. A reference implementation is available at https://github.com/webtoon/rec-fm-progressive-alignment
