# Can MLLMs Decode the Creative Leap? Introducing C4 for Cross-Concept Understanding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06501 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06501/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13549/) (2023)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01006/) (2025)
- [A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00491/) (2018)
- [MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02780/) (2026)
- [Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14556/) (2023)
- [Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00506/) (2023)
- [CMMMU: A Chinese Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11944/) (2024)
- [LatEval: An Interactive LLMs Evaluation Benchmark with Incomplete Information from Lateral Thinking Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10855/) (2023)
- [Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13012/) (2024)
- [Humor in AI: Massive Scale Crowd-Sourced Preferences and Benchmarks for Cartoon Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10522/) (2024)
- [BRAINTEASER: Lateral Thinking Puzzles for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05057/) (2023)
- [Creation-MMBench: Assessing Context-Aware Creative Intelligence in MLLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14478/) (2025)
- [A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15147/) (2025)
- [REBUS: A Robust Evaluation Benchmark of Understanding Symbols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05604/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Creative capabilities of MLLMs matter in design, communication, education, and human--AI collaboration, yet remain difficult to evaluate because explicit targets and reward signals are scarce compared with accuracy-oriented tasks. Cross-concept understanding is a core cognitive capacity underlying receptive creativity. It enables a perceiver to recover intended meaning from non-obvious but meaningful conceptual relations. We operationalize item construction as cross-concept encoding and model inference as cross-concept decoding. We introduce C4, a cognition-inspired evaluation framework for Chengyu (Chinese idiom)-based Cross-Concept Creativity. Its encoding component maps target slots to imageable substitute concepts along bridge paths in a manually annotated and third-party-reviewed cross-concept network, enabling batch generation with explicit structure, difficulty indexed by bridge count and depth, and exact answers. Using this framework, we instantiate the C4 Evaluation Set (C4-Eval), comprising 184 synthetic items and 37 human-created cross-concept chengyu figures collected from online sources. We manually construct and review cross-concept relations, bridge paths, and reasoning processes for the collected figures. Each C4-Eval item is instantiated in five task settings, yielding 884 primary answer-recovery cases. Across ten evaluated MLLMs, the strongest closed models reach 50.7% and 48.0% primary accuracy, while open-source models remain substantially lower. Candidate constraints improve accuracy sharply, but bridge hints and explanation requests provide only modest gains. These results expose a substantial gap in how current MLLMs decode creatively encoded meaning through cross-concept relations. The code is in the supplementary material.