# Learning to Predict Middle-Layer Attention in MLLMs for Visual Token Pruning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06411 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06411/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Visual token pruning in multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/inference/visual-token-pruning-in-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16821/) (2024)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07396/) (2016)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01818/) (2024)
- [Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11494/) (2025)
- [Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10967/) (2025)
- [MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18264/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Audio Token Attention Is Predictable Before the Language Model Runs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38878/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance across diverse vision-language tasks, but their efficiency is limited by the cost of processing numerous visual tokens. Visual token pruning can reduce this cost, but requires accurate token importance estimates. Recent studies have demonstrated that text-to-vision attention from middle language model layers can effectively guide visual token pruning, typically using attention from a predefined middle layer to select the visual tokens to retain. Two problems therefore remain. First, our analysis shows that the layer whose attention is most responsive to the question varies substantially across samples, making a fixed layer suboptimal. Second, obtaining attention from the appropriate middle layer requires processing numerous visual tokens through several language model layers, by which point considerable computation has already been spent. To address both problems, we propose Middle-layer Attention Prediction (MAP), which uses Question Contrastive Teacher Selection to identify a sample-specific teacher layer by contrasting attention under the original and reference questions, and distills attention from the selected layer into a lightweight predictor that estimates visual token importance from multi-modal input features. During inference, MAP combines the predicted importance scores with a diversity criterion to prune visual tokens before the first language model layer. Thus, MAP requires no attention maps for pruning and remains compatible with existing inference acceleration techniques. Across ten benchmarks on LLaVA-NeXT-7B, MAP retains 97.5% of the unpruned model performance with only 5.56% of the visual tokens, yielding a 3.09x end-to-end speedup.