# DASH: Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons for On-Policy Self-Distillation of Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06243 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06243/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)
- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02438/) (2015)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03099/) (2015)
- [Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07947/) (2016)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08146/) (2024)
- [Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06542/) (2017)
- [Unifying distillation and privileged information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.03643/) (2015)
- [Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07079/) (2026)
- [Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12173/) (2020)
- [Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02234/) (2026)
- [When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21606/) (2026)
- [On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22600/) (2026)
- [GRPO-λ: Credit Assignment improves LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00194/) (2025)
- [Your Teacher Can't Help You Here: Combating Supervision Fidelity Decay in On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30833/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Where to Look Matters: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Long-Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25356/) (2026)
- [SCOPE-OPSD: Fisher-Conditioned Privileged Subspaces for On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12579/) (2026)
- [Overcoming Scaling Limits in On-Policy Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37915/) (2026)
- [When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38995/) (2026)
- [Learning from a Thoughtful Teacher: Adaptive On-Policy Self-Distillation for Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32667/) (2026)
- [Learning from Repaired Reasoning: Root-Cause-Guided On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03515/) (2026)
- [DIAL-OPD: Learning More from Fewer Tokens in On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11659/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models using automatically verifiable outcome signals, but these signals are typically sparse and at the sequence-level. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) mitigates this sparsity by querying a privileged teacher at student-visited prefixes and providing dense token-level distributional supervision. Although this dense supervision alleviates signal sparsity, we find that standard OPSD still underexploits the temporal structure of the rollout. It assigns every local divergence the same coefficient, regardless of its position or the divergence sequence in which it occurs. In on-policy autoregressive generation, the same divergence magnitude can follow different discrepancy histories, reflecting different evolutions of the mismatch between the teacher and student. Since the local scalar alone cannot distinguish these temporal contexts, standard OPSD cannot adapt its token-level weights to the realized discrepancy sequence. To address this limitation, we propose Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons (DASH). DASH maps the gap between each local distillation signal and the sequence-level mean to an adaptive propagation gate and then uses these gates to control backward multi-step aggregation. By doing so, DASH adjusts token-level supervision weights according to how local divergences evolve during generation. Experiments on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks across three model scales show that DASH improves over our matched vanilla OPSD reruns on every benchmark at all three scales. DASH reuses the teacher and student distributions that OPSD already computes, so the gains require no additional teacher or student forward pass. Code: https://github.com/DBtxy/DASH-OPSD