# ML-for-ML

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06046 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06046/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03983/) (2016)
- [Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02677/) (2017)
- [Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01186/) (2015)
- [Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09767/) (2018)
- [Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00489/) (2017)
- [An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06162/) (2018)
- [Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08741/) (2017)
- [Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05021/) (2017)
- [Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Tenant GPU Clusters for DNN Training Workloads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.05758/) (2019)
- [Adaptive Communication Strategies to Achieve the Best Error-Runtime Trade-off in Local-Update SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08313/) (2018)
- [Pollux: Co-adaptive Cluster Scheduling for Goodput-Optimized Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12260/) (2020)
- [CASSINI: Network-Aware Job Scheduling in Machine Learning Clusters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00852/) (2023)
- [THC: Accelerating Distributed Deep Learning Using Tensor Homomorphic Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08545/) (2023)
- [Design and Operation of Shared Machine Learning Clusters on Campus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01556/) (2021)
- [Beyond Throughput and Compression Ratios: Towards High End-to-end Utility of Gradient Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01378/) (2024)
- [DynamiQ: Accelerating Gradient Synchronization using Compressed Multi-hop All-reduce](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08923/) (2026)
- [Low latency via redundancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.3707/) (2013)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [TORQUE: Optimizing What (not) to Quantize Before and After Rotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36032/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI training workloads are growing rapidly, making their time, energy, and infrastructure costs increasingly important. In shared cloud clusters, training and fine-tuning jobs compete with co-running workloads for network resources, while network mechanisms and ML training choices are typically optimized separately: networking controls how bytes move, whereas ML systems control when and how much communication occurs. We argue that this separation leaves end-to-end performance on the table. We present ML-for-ML, a cross-layer perspective in which network-side and ML-side knobs are selected jointly under a shared time-to-target-loss objective. Our preliminary prototype shows that by co-optimizing the ML and network parameters, we reach the target loss up to 42% faster.