# PhyLatent: Learning Dynamics-Relevant Representations for JEPA World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05720 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05720/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Latent predictive world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/latent-predictive-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10566/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08254/) (2021)
- [Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03230/) (2021)
- [Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01603/) (2019)
- [Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04551/) (2018)
- [Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.05363/) (2017)
- [VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04906/) (2021)
- [Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08243/) (2023)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08471/) (2024)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.06888/) (2017)
- [Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10742/) (2020)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12983/) (2020)
- [LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19312/) (2026)
- [LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08544/) (2025)
- [OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20092/) (2024)
- [DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02736/) (2019)
- [Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14819/) (2025)
- [Denoised MDPs: Learning World Models Better Than the World Itself](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.15477/) (2022)
- [stable-worldmodel: A Platform for Reproducible World Modeling Research and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21800/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [SCALE: State-Calibrated Latent Embeddings for JEPA Planning in the Right Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16287/) (2026)
- [JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24044/) (2026)
- [FIRM-WM: State-factorized factual-interventional recurrent modeling for reward-free visual planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22816/) (2026)
- [Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01224/) (2026)
- [Keeping JEPA World Models Plannable When Little of the Frame Moves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03137/) (2026)
- [When Low Prediction Error Misleads Planning: Diagnosing Representation, Dynamics, and Decision Failures in Latent World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05550/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose PhyLatent, a dynamics-relevant training objective for Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) world models. Our key observation is that preventing global latent collapse does not necessarily ensure that the learned representation preserves physically meaningful state and action relationships. We identify three failure modes: sensitivity to appearance changes that leave the physical state unchanged, insufficient separation of distinct physical states, and insufficient separation of different action-conditioned futures. We refer to these as Physical Invariance Collapse, Physical Distinguishability Collapse, and Counterfactual Dynamics Collapse, respectively. PhyLatent targets these failures through three coordinated training pathways, implemented with static visual invariance, physical state grounding, future representation alignment, counterfactual branch separation, and latent denoising. On OGBench-Cube, PhyLatent reduces the three collapse rates by 43.9%, 27.9%, and 47.1%, respectively, while improving model predictive control (MPC) success by 12.0 percentage points (17.2% relative). Across four visual-control tasks, average planning success increases by 6.62 percentage points (8.3% relative). These results show that global non-collapse alone is insufficient for learning a reliable JEPA world-model state space, and that explicitly preserving dynamics-relevant structure can improve closed-loop planning.