# Reasoning Errors Have a Region and a Direction in the Residual-Stream Trajectory of LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05660 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05660/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03827/) (2022)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06824/) (2023)
- [Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08112/) (2023)
- [The emergence of clusters in self-attention dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05465/) (2023)
- [Understanding and Improving Transformer From a Multi-Particle Dynamic System Point of View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02762/) (2019)
- [Language Models are Injective and Hence Invertible](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15511/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models are overconfident and amplify human bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02151/) (2025)
- [The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical Proofs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21621/) (2025)
- [The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09782/) (2025)
- [I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08980/) (2025)
- [Transformer Dynamics: A neuroscientific approach to interpretability of large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12131/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As language models are increasingly used for tasks that require verifiable reasoning, reliably distinguishing sound reasoning from flawed reasoning has become an important practical problem. Recent trajectory-based methods seek this signal in layerwise residual-stream displacements, which capture how representations change while attenuating some stable, token-specific information. However, displacement omits the state from which an update originates, whereas restoring the full state risks reintroducing shortcut-prone information. We identify this trade-off and propose a three-stream detector that combines motion with two restricted views of location. A coarse region reader based on vector quantization and a fine direction reader over normalized multi-layer states. This design restores enough state context to interpret the motion without returning to full-state probing. On reasoning benchmarks unseen during training, our method improves selection accuracy by up to 12% over the displacement-only state of the art and 21% over single-layer probing baselines. Although trained only on reasoning benchmarks, it also reads factual completion and fact verification, ahead of every detector we compare against, which places the signal on correctness rather than on a kind of reasoning. Ablations further show that motion, region, and direction provide complementary signals. These results suggest that reasoning validity is better read from state-conditioned motion than from either static states or decontextualized trajectories alone.