# From Sports to Safety: Benchmarking Proactive Risk Inference in MLLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05560 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05560/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 34 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/safety/safety-alignment-refusal-and-guardrails/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03693/) (2023)
- [Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03286/) (2022)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15817/) (2023)
- [HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08775/) (2025)
- [Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14470/) (2024)
- [R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10019/) (2024)
- [Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13626/) (2023)
- [STaR-GATE: Teaching Language Models to Ask Clarifying Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19154/) (2024)
- [SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04957/) (2025)
- [RedCode: Risky Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07781/) (2024)
- [Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12361/) (2024)
- [Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06627/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02750/) (2023)
- [QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22674/) (2025)
- [DADA-2000: Can Driving Accident be Predicted by Driver Attention? Analyzed by A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12634/) (2019)
- [Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12670/) (2024)
- [ContextAgent: Context-Aware Proactive LLM Agents with Open-World Sensory Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14668/) (2025)
- [SafeText: A Benchmark for Exploring Physical Safety in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10045/) (2022)
- [SafeWatch: An Efficient Safety-Policy Following Video Guardrail Model with Transparent Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06878/) (2024)
- [DisasterResponseGPT: Large Language Models for Accelerated Plan of Action Development in Disaster Response Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17271/) (2023)
- [Video-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Video LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11842/) (2025)
- [LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10908/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Timely anticipation of physical hazards is essential for real-world safety, yet existing MLLM evaluations focus on harmful content or general risks, leaving proactive physical hazard prediction underexplored. Sports provide a well-suited testbed: accident causes span diverse injury dimensions and pre-accident spatiotemporal cues draw on reasoning capabilities shared with broader safety domains such as autonomous driving and fall detection. We introduce SPRINT (Sports Proactive Risk INference Testbed), a benchmark of 2,888 real-world sports videos (2,440 accident, 448 safe controls) spanning 14 sports and 3 environmental settings. Accident videos feature fine-grained annotations of early hazard cues, accident timing, and hierarchical causes; safe videos are manually verified as accident-free and serve to diagnose prompt-induced false alarms. Evaluating state-of-the-art MLLMs under diverse prompts and temporal windows reveals a sharp gap between hazard sensitivity and understanding: the best model exceeds 95% in signaling hazards yet falls below 50% in identifying their causes. Diagnostic experiments further show that explicit danger queries trigger severe false alarms even on hazard-free videos. These findings indicate that current MLLMs exhibit only superficial proactive safety, lacking stable, cause-grounded early warning, and underscore the need for reliable proactive safety in dynamic physical environments. Data and code will be open-sourced upon acceptance.