# Decoupling Perception from Description: Computation-Grounded Representation Alignment between Multivariate Time Series and Language

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05238 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05238/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07436/) (2020)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02592/) (2024)
- [MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03885/) (2024)
- [Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16040/) (2024)
- [Monash Time Series Forecasting Archive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06643/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models for Time Series: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01801/) (2024)
- [ChatTS: Aligning Time Series with LLMs via Synthetic Data for Enhanced Understanding and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03104/) (2024)
- [ChatTime: A Unified Multimodal Time Series Foundation Model Bridging Numerical and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11376/) (2024)
- [Language Models Still Struggle to Zero-shot Reason about Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11757/) (2024)
- [Time-MQA: Time Series Multi-Task Question Answering with Context Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01875/) (2025)
- [ITFormer: Bridging Time Series and Natural Language for Multi-Modal QA with Large-Scale Multitask Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20093/) (2025)
- [TSRBench: A Comprehensive Multi-task Multi-modal Time Series Reasoning Benchmark for Generalist Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18744/) (2026)
- [BEDTime: A Unified Benchmark for Automatically Describing Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05215/) (2025)
- [PATRA: Pattern-Aware Alignment and Balanced Reasoning for Time Series Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23161/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LineupRL: Verifiable Reinforcement Learning for Time Series Captioning via Caption-to-Series Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01800/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Training multimodal models to align time series with language runs into a self-supervision trap. The usual recipe asks an LLM to read a series and write a description, so label quality is capped by the perceptual skill the model is supposed to learn. The data can never teach more than the labeler already knows. A second gap makes this worse: most datasets use a single variable, but the patterns that matter (cross-channel correlation, lead-lag structure, co-occurring anomalies) appear only with several variables, right where the labeling LLM's limits are most exposed. These two problems create a trilemma: existing methods are reliable, realistic, or scalable, but none achieves all three. We resolve this by decoupling perception from description. Deterministic code computes a set of statistics from real, open-source multivariate series; the LLM verbalizes those precomputed facts. Perception, which LLMs do poorly, is handled by computation, while the LLM handles expression. This produces CGTime, our 4B-parameter computation-grounded time-series-language model. CGTime outperforms far larger general-purpose models on multivariate understanding tasks: it attains the best multivariate fact score on our held-out benchmark (0.283 vs. 0.173 for GPT-4o-mini and 0.203 for GPT-5.4-nano), a gap that survives Holm-corrected paired significance tests against every baseline. It also states verifiable numerical facts in generated captions more accurately and covers a broader range of statistical properties.