# Woodpecker Distillation: Weak Models Diagnose Reasoning Bugs in Strong Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05168 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05168/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09390/) (2023)
- [RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05302/) (2023)
- [Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06295/) (2015)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18629/) (2024)
- [Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03188/) (2023)
- [Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06102/) (2024)
- [Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03540/) (2022)
- [Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22312/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Who Teaches Which Token? Verifier-Gated Multi-Expert On-Policy Distillation for Scientific Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15404/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models often fail on reasoning tasks despite possessing the capability to solve them. We argue that many such failures arise from localized reasoning bugs in intermediate steps rather than from global incompetence. We show that these bugs are frequently repairable: inserting a short patch generated by a weak probe model after the same strong-model reasoning prefix can redirect the trajectory toward a correct solution. However, this corrective effect is not reliably internalized by directly fine-tuning on weak patches or repaired trajectories, suggesting that the useful signal lies not in the intervention text itself, but in how it reshapes the model's future reasoning distribution. We therefore propose Woodpecker Distillation, a weak-to-strong training framework that learns from contrastive local interventions. Our method contrasts successful and unsuccessful weak-model patches at the same prefix, constructs a corrective teacher distribution from their induced future token predictions, and distills this signal into the strong model. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that Woodpecker Distillation consistently improves strong-model performance and outperforms direct imitation baselines.