# Continual-Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Parameterized Partial Differential Equations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04778/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08064/) (2022)
- [PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08827/) (2023)
- [GPLaSDI: Gaussian Process-based Interpretable Latent Space Dynamics Identification through Deep Autoencoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05882/) (2023)
- [DeepCFD: Efficient Steady-State Laminar Flow Approximation with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08826/) (2020)
- [GrADE: A graph based data-driven solver for time-dependent nonlinear partial differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10639/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) incorporate governing equations into neural-network training and can approximate PDE solutions without requiring large observational datasets. Parameterized PINNs (ParamPINNs) further take physical parameters as inputs, allowing a single model to represent a family of PDE solutions over a parameter domain. Existing ParamPINNs, however, still face inefficient training, uneven accuracy across parameters, and overfitting to a limited set of sampled parameter tasks, which can impair generalization to unsampled parameters. To address these issues, we propose a continual-learning physics-informed neural network (CL-PINN), which treats PDE instances at different parameter values as related tasks and learns them sequentially. CL-PINN combines Bayesian-optimization-based active parameter selection, task-wise dynamic loss weighting, sparse physics-constrained replay, and an optional parameter subnetwork to improve task allocation and knowledge retention under bounded active-task capacity. It requires no observational data and is designed to solve parameterized PDEs over relatively broad parameter domains under limited computational resources. Multi-seed evaluations on five benchmarks, including one continuous function and four parameterized PDEs, show that Bayesian selection substantially reduces objective-loss queries relative to grid-greedy search, while sparse replay mitigates forgetting of earlier tasks. Under the prescribed within-case resource protocols, CL-PINN generally provides higher and more balanced solution accuracy than fixed-sampling and grid-greedy baselines. CL-PINN offers a practical route toward learning PDE solutions that generalize across physical parameters and has the potential to support reusable physics-informed surrogates for large-scale engineering parameter studies.