# D2F-ReAG: Dynamic Decomposition and Filtering for Multi-Hop Reasoning-Augmented Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04444 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04444/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.18059/) (2024)
- [LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05779/) (2024)
- [MiniLMv2: Multi-Head Self-Attention Relation Distillation for Compressing Pretrained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15828/) (2020)
- [From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14802/) (2025)
- [Generate-then-Ground in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14891/) (2024)
- [On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20009/) (2024)
- [EfficientRAG: Efficient Retriever for Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04259/) (2024)
- [You Don't Need Pre-built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06105/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Lost-in-Retrieval Problems in Retrieval Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14245/) (2025)
- [DualRAG: A Dual-Process Approach to Integrate Reasoning and Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18243/) (2025)
- [SUBQRAG: Sub-Question Driven Dynamic Graph RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07718/) (2025)
- [Self-Critique Guided Iterative Reasoning for Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19112/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate answers due to their reliance on static internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by integrating external knowledge and excelling at single-hop queries. However, it struggles with multi-hop questions that require cross-document reasoning. Existing methods, such as graph structured RAG or question decomposition, often lack dynamic decomposition and effective filtering, which leads to lower efficiency and accuracy. To overcome these limitations, we propose Dynamic Decomposition and Filtering for Multi-Hop Reasoning-Augmented Generation (D2F-ReAG), a novel paradigm that adaptively controls reasoning depth by judging the reliability of the root-level reasoning. If the root reasoning is reliable, the model directly generates the answer. Otherwise, the question is logically decomposed into sub-questions, and the verified reasoning derived from these sub-questions is used to refine the root reasoning. Experiments on three multi-hop benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in handling complex multi-hop questions.