# TIDE: A Physically Diverse 3D Turbulence Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Scientific Machine Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04222 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04222/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01010/) (2021)
- [Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11075/) (2019)
- [Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02366/) (2024)
- [Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00016/) (2020)
- [Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08655/) (2019)
- [Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19101/) (2024)
- [DPOT: Auto-Regressive Denoising Operator Transformer for Large-Scale PDE Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03542/) (2024)
- [The Well: a Large-Scale Collection of Diverse Physics Simulations for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00568/) (2024)
- [Scalable Transformer for PDE Surrogate Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17560/) (2023)
- [Multiple Physics Pretraining for Physical Surrogate Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02994/) (2023)
- [Learned Coarse Models for Efficient Turbulence Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.15275/) (2021)
- [Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01745/) (2023)
- [Multi-Grid Tensorized Fourier Neural Operator for High-Resolution PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00120/) (2023)
- [APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00180/) (2024)
- [CFDBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning Methods in Fluid Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05963/) (2023)
- [Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13457/) (2023)
- [Learning PDE Solvers with Physics and Data: A Unifying View of Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Neural Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14517/) (2026)
- [PEST: Physics-Enhanced Swin Transformer for 3D Turbulence Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10150/) (2026)
- [FlowRefiner: Flow Matching-Based Iterative Refinement for 3D Turbulent Flow Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17149/) (2026)
- [Differential-Integral Neural Operator for Long-Term Turbulence Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21196/) (2025)
- [Flow Learners for PDEs: Toward a Physics-to-Physics Paradigm for Scientific Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07366/) (2026)
- [Physics-Preserving Latent Compression for Zero-Shot Resolution Transfer in 3D Turbulence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21781/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Staying on the Attractor: Supervising Neural Surrogates of 3D Turbulence Where They Leave It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32864/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Turbulence is a central testbed for machine learning on physical dynamics because its governing laws are known exactly. However, most existing studies remain in 2D, while 3D turbulence has fundamentally different physics and is far more costly to simulate. Existing 3D resources also typically provide only one realization per configuration, making it difficult to distinguish learning the dynamics from fitting the statistics of a single flow. In this paper, we introduce TIDE (Turbulent Incompressible DNS Ensembles), a 256^3 DNS corpus and benchmark for 3D incompressible turbulence, with 15 configurations on eight controlled axes, independent ensembles, pressure fields, and equation-level verification. The benchmark includes five tasks, standardized learned baselines, controlled generalization splits, and physical-fidelity metrics alongside pointwise error. Across the main forecasting configurations, current learned models barely outperform persistence and still make about twice the error of a spectral solver given the true equations. Moreover, lower pointwise error can coincide with severely distorted small-scale dynamics, showing that accuracy alone does not ensure physical fidelity. Generalization results further show that most regime shifts reflect limited training coverage, whereas forced-to-decay transfer exposes a missing conditioning variable: operators trained under forcing continue to predict driven evolution when the external drive is removed. Closing these accuracy, fidelity, and conditioning gaps is the central open problem made measurable by TIDE.