# Transfer Learning for Named Entity Recognition of Classical Latin through LLM Prompting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04015 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04015/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [MEGAVERSE: Benchmarking Large Language Models Across Languages, Modalities, Models and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07463/) (2023)
- [Latin BERT: A Contextual Language Model for Classical Philology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10053/) (2020)
- [Exploring Large Language Models for Classical Philology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13698/) (2023)
- [Performance of Recent Large Language Models for a Low-Resourced Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21330/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the increase in digitized resources of Classical Latin texts and modern breakthroughs of Large Language Models (LLMs), I contribute to ancient language research by participating in EvaLatin 2026. This paper describes Team uOttawa's system description and results for the Named Entity Recognition (NER) shared task. The task is divided into two subtasks: coarse-grained NER with 11 classes and fine-grained NER with 28 classes, each evaluated under strict and fuzzy regimes. Through prompt engineering of commercial LLMs gemini-2.5-pro and claude-sonnet-4-5, I show that the underrepresented ancient Latin language can take advantage of cross-lingual transfer learning by using advancements made by the wider LLM development community. Overall, the methods discussed in this report demonstrate very strong results, placing first in both NER subtasks and achieving the best scores across all evaluation metrics and regimes among all submissions.
