# Bimanual Manipulation Within an 8 GB Budget: Zero-Copy Sensing and Quantized ACT on an Entry-Level Jetson

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03938 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03938/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)
- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Robot manipulation imitation learning](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/robot-manipulation-imitation-learning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13705/) (2023)
- [GELLO: A General, Low-Cost, and Intuitive Teleoperation Framework for Robot Manipulators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13037/) (2023)
- [A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03146/) (2019)
- [LeRobot: An Open-Source Library for End-to-End Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22818/) (2026)
- [ALOHA 2: An Enhanced Low-Cost Hardware for Bimanual Teleoperation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02292/) (2024)
- [Look Closer: Bridging Egocentric and Third-Person Views with Transformers for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07779/) (2022)
- [InterACT: Inter-dependency Aware Action Chunking with Hierarchical Attention Transformers for Bimanual Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07914/) (2024)
- [Active Vision Might Be All You Need: Exploring Active Vision in Bimanual Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17435/) (2024)
- [Edge Computing and its Application in Robotics: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.00523/) (2025)
- [Learning Bimanual Manipulation via Action Chunking and Inter-Arm Coordination with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13916/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Generalizable Bimanual Manipulation: RoboTwin Dual-Arm Collaboration Challenge at CVPR 2025 MEIS Workshop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23351/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Bimanual manipulation policies trained with imitation learning are typically evaluated on workstation or datacenter-class GPUs, leaving the cost of deploying them on embedded hardware largely uncharacterized. We present a bimanual SO-101 system running entirely on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super (8 GB), the entry-level tier of NVIDIA's embedded line, using a desktop GPU (RTX 3070) only for offline training, evaluated on pick-and-place of a deformable beanbag. First, we build a GStreamer capture pipeline backed by NVMM buffers that removes redundant host-device copies from three-camera sensing. Contrary to expectation, the conventional path fit the memory budget and dropped no frames; what zero-copy sensing recovers is CPU headroom (peak single-core utilization 98.0% to 77.0%) and worst-case latency (117.31 ms to 101.52 ms). Second, we train ACT and Diffusion Policy on identical demonstrations, each at its own reference budget (100k gradient steps for ACT, 200k for Diffusion Policy). ACT converges to a task-competent policy (19/20 trials) while Diffusion Policy does not converge to a usable one (0/10) even at twice the step count, which we attribute to differing convergence costs rather than an accuracy ceiling. Third, we convert ACT to TensorRT. FP16 reduces mean inference latency from 114.02 ms to 17.93 ms (6.4x) and INT8 to 12.65 ms (9.0x), with task success preserved at all three precisions (19/20, 18/20, 19/20). We report two findings not previously documented for ACT: TensorRT's general-purpose INT8 calibration quantizes the ResNet18 backbone but accepts zero of 145 transformer layers, explaining INT8's negligible size reduction over FP16 (0.9%) despite a further 28% latency gain; and the need for quantization is conditional on ACT's action-chunking configuration, feasible in full precision at n_action_steps = 100 but not at the per-step re-prediction temporal ensembling requires.