# Automatic Patient-Specific Microwave Ablation Planning Accelerated by a Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03086 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03086/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07871/) (2017)
- [The Medical Segmentation Decathlon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05735/) (2021)
- [TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05868/) (2022)
- [PhysRFANet: Physics-Guided Neural Network for Real-Time Prediction of Thermal Effect During Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.13947/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Microwave ablation (MWA) is a promising minimally invasive treatment for liver tumors, but its therapeutic outcome strongly depends on patient-specific planning of antenna insertion trajectory, power, and treatment duration. Accurate numerical simulation can provide physically reliable ablation predictions; however, its high computational cost limits its use in optimization-based planning, where repeated forward evaluations are required. To address this issue, we propose a digital twin-based automatic planning framework that combines a neural ablation prediction model with a genetic algorithm. The model was trained on multiphysics simulation data generated from patient-specific tumor and vessel structures, antenna configurations, and treatment conditions, and was used as a fast forward model during planning. The prediction model achieved a Dice score of 95.1%, enabling accurate deep learning-based optimization. In 13 unseen planning cases, the proposed method improved ablation efficiency by 54.3% and reduced organ damage by 55.0% compared with clinician-defined planning, while slightly shortening the insertion path length by 3.3%. Most generated plans were also judged clinically applicable by MWA specialists. Furthermore, the framework enabled approximately 420-fold faster planning than numerical-simulation-based planning, demonstrating its potential as a fast digital twin for quantitative and personalized MWA treatment planning. The code is available at: https://github.com/SeonAengCho/MWA-Planning.git
