# RIDGE: Re-Noising with Internal Dynamic Guidance for Image Editing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03059 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03059/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01626/) (2022)
- [SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.01073/) (2021)
- [Emu Edit: Precise Image Editing via Recognition and Generation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10089/) (2023)
- [FlowEdit: Inversion-Free Text-Based Editing Using Pre-Trained Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08629/) (2024)
- [Splicing ViT Features for Semantic Appearance Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00424/) (2022)
- [Taming Rectified Flow for Inversion and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04746/) (2024)
- [Semantic Image Inversion and Editing using Rectified Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10792/) (2024)
- [Stable Flow: Vital Layers for Training-Free Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14430/) (2024)
- [UniEdit-Flow: Unleashing Inversion and Editing in the Era of Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13109/) (2025)
- [Unveil Inversion and Invariance in Flow Transformer for Versatile Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15843/) (2024)
- [FlowAlign: Trajectory-Regularized, Inversion-Free Flow-based Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23145/) (2025)
- [SplitFlow: Flow Decomposition for Inversion-Free Text-to-Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25970/) (2025)
- [FIA-Edit: Frequency-Interactive Attention for Efficient and High-Fidelity Inversion-Free Text-Guided Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12151/) (2025)
- [Delta Rectified Flow Sampling for Text-to-Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05342/) (2025)
- [FlowDC: Flow-Based Decoupling-Decay for Complex Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11395/) (2025)
- [Target-aware Image Editing via Cycle-consistent Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20212/) (2025)
- [SNR-Edit: Structure-Aware Noise Rectification for Inversion-Free Flow-Based Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19180/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Inversion-free flow-based image editing avoids latent inversion, but still requires a target-side state at every editing step. The widely used equal-displacement construction keeps the displacement between the noisy source state and the target-side state unchanged across noise levels. This is inconsistent with noising, under which the displacement between two clean states noised with the same noise level and noise sample should contract as the noise level increases. Thus, it can lead to overly aggressive updates at high noise levels. We introduce RIDGE: Re-Noising with Internal Dynamic Guidance for Image Editing, an inversion-free and training-free method that maintains the edited state as an evolving approximation to the unavailable clean target state. RIDGE re-noises this approximation using the same noise level and noise sample as the clean source state, allowing their noisy displacement to decrease naturally with increasing noise. Since the edited state initially contains limited target semantics, RIDGE further applies internal dynamic guidance during the early high-noise steps. A clean target state prediction guides the provisional edited state through a soft dynamic mask derived internally from the model, focusing guidance on regions that require modification without external segmentation or detection models. Experiments on two benchmarks using two backbones, SD3 Medium and FLUX.1-dev, show that RIDGE offers a favorable aggregate trade-off among source preservation, target alignment, and perceptual quality.