# Your Agentic LLMs Secretly Encode Indirect Prompt-Injection Exposure in Hidden States

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02657 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02657/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 83 of its 97 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)
- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 83)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06681/) (2023)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03827/) (2022)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02691/) (2024)
- [The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13208/) (2024)
- [Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02151/) (2024)
- [Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01833/) (2024)
- [Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11926/) (2025)
- [StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06363/) (2024)
- [Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02644/) (2024)
- [Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12815/) (2023)
- [Defeating Prompt Injections by Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18813/) (2025)
- [Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlighting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14720/) (2024)
- [LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02707/) (2024)
- [Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06102/) (2024)
- [SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05451/) (2024)
- [Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11944/) (2024)
- [Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29358/) (2026)
- [WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18575/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Readable Before Actionable: Causal Tracing of Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05295/) (2026)
- [DriftNet: A Dual-Head Trajectory Transformer for Detecting and Localizing Prompt Injection in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.10892/) (2026)
- [CounterSteer: Suppressing Indirect Prompt Injection with Activation Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36570/) (2026)
- [False Floors: LLM Safety Routing Evaluations Break Under Distribution Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01535/) (2026)
- [The Agent Knew: Internal States Forecast Unauthorized Actions and Stop Them, and the Lies That Follow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17301/) (2026)
- [Prompt-Injection Probes Learn the Conversation, Not Just the Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18408/) (2026)
- [Are You Reading the Right Thing? Rethinking Internal Signals for Prompt-Injection Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19452/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic LLMs are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks, e.g., malicious side-tasks hidden in external tool results. While many efforts have sought to address this threat, little is known about the internals of agentic LLMs when they are exposed to IPI attacks. For simplicity, we refer to this condition as IPI exposure. In this paper, we study IPI exposure from three perspectives. (1) Probing: Across eight models, including the 753B-parameter GLM-5.2 and the 2.8T-parameter Kimi-K3, simple linear probes trained on pre-generation hidden states can predict LLMs' IPI exposure. These probes achieve 0.90+ AUROC on unseen attacks, agent instructions, and task suites; they remain robustly predictive under adaptive attacks and in cross-lingual settings. (2) Defense: We reveal and diagnose a knowledge-action gap: post-trained LLMs encode signals predictive of IPI exposure, yet do not reliably bind these signals to safe agentic actions. We therefore introduce a probe-gated reasoning-based defense to bridge this gap at test time. On difficult AgentDojo settings, it substantially reduces attack success rate, e.g., from 34.6% to 0% on Qwen3.5-27B, and better preserves clean-task utility than the baselines. (3) Explanation: We introduce an analysis framework that identifies natural-language explanations strongly correlated with probe-captured signals. The resulting profiles differ across models: latent signals can align with either direct IPI-exposure sensing or indirect operational cues. Code is available at https://github.com/jianshuod/IPI-exposure-signal.