# An AI-Based Decision-Support Pipeline for Day-Ahead Photovoltaic Forecasting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02088 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02088/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Group Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08494/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable photovoltaic (PV) forecasts can support low-carbon energy systems, but deployed sites may have only short and incomplete records. Physical and hybrid methods can be sensitive to weather inputs, calibration, and timestamp-alignment, while individual machine learning models may capture different parts of the forecasting problem. We study hourly day-ahead PV forecasting at a United Kingdom charging station using one year of inverter measurements, with 9.25% of hours missing. The pipeline checks timestamp-alignment, derives solar and clearness features, adds short-term weather context, and combines five complementary models using non-negative least squares stacking, with the combination fitted only on validation observations. We compare against smart persistence, a weather-scaled baseline that carries the previous day's PV behaviour forward using target-day irradiance. With retrospective weather, the combined model reduces daylight normalised root mean square error (RMSE) by 31.2% under random day-fold evaluation and by 2.9% under rolling-origin evaluation, although the latter improvement is not robust across days. It also improves by 3.0% over the single model selected from validation performance. Replacing retrospective weather with a public product sampled at a constant 24-hour lead increases daylight RMSE by 13.1% and 4.2% under the two protocols, while retaining positive skill over smart persistence.