# Grounding and Explaining Visual Evidence for AI-Generated Image Detection in Human-Centric Scenes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01988 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01988/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02905/) (2024)
- [CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11035/) (2019)
- [Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10174/) (2023)
- [GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08571/) (2023)
- [Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22699/) (2025)
- [Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20427/) (2025)
- [Seedream 3.0 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11346/) (2025)
- [Fluid: Scaling Autoregressive Text-to-image Generative Models with Continuous Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13863/) (2024)
- [Perception-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06448/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19091/) (2024)
- [Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14905/) (2025)
- [LEGION: Learning to Ground and Explain for Synthetic Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15264/) (2025)
- [Perceptual Artifacts Localization for Image Synthesis Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05590/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10461/) (2023)
- [Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21210/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Not Every Cue Is Evidence: Cue Supportability for Forensic Distillation in Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16452/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid advances in image generation models call for interpretable AI-generated image detection methods that not only determine authenticity but also provide supporting visual evidence. Existing approaches may produce inconsistencies between generated explanations and localized evidence regions, undermining the reliability of explanations for authenticity decisions. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of the diverse human-centric scenes prevalent in generated imagery. To address these limitations, we investigate authenticity detection with grounded and explainable visual evidence in human-centric scenes. We present HAVE (Human-centric AI-generated Visual Evidence), a diverse human-centric dataset comprising 40K real and 39K AI-generated images from 10 recent generators, with 106K localized evidence instances across 8 evidence categories, each annotated with a bounding box and a region-aligned explanation. We further propose PAVE, a Perception-Aware Visual Evidence framework that jointly performs authenticity prediction, visual evidence grounding, and region-aligned explanation generation. PAVE employs a judge-guided alignment reward to assess region--explanation consistency and evidence validity, together with perception-aware regularization that contrasts token-level predictions between original and randomly masked images to promote reliance on visual input. Experiments on HAVE and external datasets demonstrate strong performance in authenticity detection, visual evidence grounding, and explanation quality. Code and data will be released upon publication.
