# ET-Prune: Evidence-Aware Dynamic Budgeting for Visual Token Pruning in Text-Rich MLLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01979 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01979/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Visual token pruning in multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/inference/visual-token-pruning-in-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02034/) (2021)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [Monkey: Image Resolution and Text Label Are Important Things for Large Multi-modal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06607/) (2023)
- [PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17247/) (2024)
- [mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5: Unified Structure Learning for OCR-free Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12895/) (2024)
- [BlockDrop: Dynamic Inference Paths in Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08393/) (2017)
- [OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00321/) (2024)
- [ChemVLM: Exploring the Power of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry Area](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07246/) (2024)
- [Token Reduction Should Go Beyond Efficiency in Generative Models -- From Vision, Language to Multimodality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18227/) (2025)
- [IVC-Prune: Revealing the Implicit Visual Coordinates in LVLMs for Vision Token Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03060/) (2026)
- [G2TR: Generation-Guided Visual Token Reduction for Separate-Encoder Unified Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12309/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CoViST: Visual Token Compression via Composable States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33397/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of multimodal large language models, but a fixed token ratio is poorly matched to text-rich inputs. In OCR-centric tasks, decisive evidence can be a small number, label, or field whose relevance is specified by the question; indiscriminate pruning can erase that evidence while retaining visually salient but irrelevant regions. We present ET-Prune, a training-free framework that casts pruning as evidence allocation. It derives question-conditioned evidence from a decoder-side partial query-key block, safeguards text-like spatial regions, and converts evidence uncertainty and density into a sample-specific token floor. Three progressive middle-layer events then move the sequence toward this budget, retaining more tokens for diffuse or text-dense evidence and pruning concentrated evidence more aggressively. At the observed point estimates from one deterministic pass per configuration, ET-Prune leads or ties among pruned methods in all six backbone-benchmark comparisons at roughly half tokens. On OCRBench-v2, it leads the strongest pruned baselines by 1.80 and 0.68 percentage points on Qwen3-VL-8B and InternVL3.5-8B, respectively, while retaining about half of the visual tokens; on MMBench v1.1, it reaches 0.8467 circular exact-matching accuracy versus 0.8437 for Vanilla at 54.45% average visual-token retention. These results show a favorable observed quality-cost trade-off for evidence-aware dynamic budgeting in text-rich multimodal inference.