# Agentic Self-Healing for Data and AI Pipelines: An Affordable Vendor-Agnostic Architecture using Open-Source Software

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01955 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01955/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 6 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09926/) (2020)
- [Automatic Root Cause Analysis via Large Language Models for Cloud Incidents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15778/) (2023)
- [Recommending Root-Cause and Mitigation Steps for Cloud Incidents using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03797/) (2023)
- [Operationalizing Machine Learning: An Interview Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09125/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern organizations rely on data, machine learning, and software delivery pipelines to move data, train models, deploy applications, refresh dashboards, and support business-critical decisions. However, these pipelines often fail because of data quality issues, schema changes, upstream source changes, infrastructure problems, orchestration failures, and model workflow issues. Existing ZeroOps, observability, and AI operations platforms can help teams detect incidents, investigate root causes, and in some cases recommend or execute fixes. However, many of these solutions are expensive, vendor-specific, or difficult for smaller teams to adapt across different tools and environments. This paper first compares existing off-the-shelf solutions for AI-assisted pipeline monitoring, root-cause analysis, and automated remediation, including their strengths, limitations, and practical trade-offs. Based on this comparison, we find that the main gap is architectural rather than technological: the required ingredients for self-healing pipelines already exist, but they are fragmented across vendor-specific platforms, observability tools, incident systems, and open-source components. We therefore propose an affordable, vendor-agnostic reference architecture for agentic self-healing pipelines using open-source and low-cost tools. The proposed architecture combines monitoring, pipeline metadata, incident history, deterministic policy checks, AI-assisted diagnosis, approval workflows, and controlled remediation actions to help teams detect, diagnose, repair, verify, and learn from pipeline issues with less manual effort. The goal is to provide a practical reference architecture that can be adapted across data engineering, machine learning operations, and software delivery environments.