# CockpitHAT: Dependency-Graph-Driven Hierarchical Attribution for Embodied Multi-Agent Cockpits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01805 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01805/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07924/) (2023)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11939/) (2024)
- [EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09560/) (2025)
- [MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01935/) (2025)
- [Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving Car](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.10838/) (2019)
- [IS-Bench: Evaluating Interactive Safety of VLM-Driven Embodied Agents in Daily Household Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16402/) (2025)
- [Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13782/) (2025)
- [Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04886/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25001/) (2026)
- [AgentDrive: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Agentic AI Reasoning with LLM-Generated Scenarios in Autonomous Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16964/) (2026)
- [ChatGPT on the Road: Leveraging Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agents for Safer and More Enjoyable Driving Experience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08101/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Contextual Understanding for In-Car Conversational Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12042/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [DeFA: Dependency-Guided Failure Attribution for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01256/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM multi-agent systems suffer from Correctness Collapse, where high task-level accuracy conceals severe process-level failures. This is especially hazardous in safety-critical embodied settings such as automotive cockpits, where lexically correct utterances may trigger dangerous physical operations. Existing attribution methods rely on text traces alone, missing dependency structure, multi-channel evidence, and safety-aware evaluation. We introduce CockpitHAT, a hierarchical attribution framework that replaces positional windows with dependency-distance thresholds from interaction DAGs, integrates multi-channel evidence via an embodied adapter, and applies a safety-uplift to high-risk failures during confidence-weighted analyst consensus. We further release CockpitBench, a benchmark of 212 annotated failure traces spanning dialogue, vehicle-state, environmental, and memory channels, each labeled with ISO 26262 ASIL severity via three-expert consensus. On the public Who&When benchmark, CockpitHAT achieves agent-level / step-exact accuracies of 77.9% / 37.8% on the Hand-Crafted split and 86.5% / 46.0% on the Algorithm-Generated split, surpassing the text-only SOTA ECHO by up to 17.6 / 16.7 points. On CockpitBench, it attains 78.3% agent-level and 38.2% step-exact accuracy. These results establish dependency-aware, multi-channel, risk-calibrated attribution as an effective paradigm for reliable failure diagnosis in real-world embodied LLM multi-agent systems.