# TIDES: A Longitudinal Bilingual Dataset for Modeling Multi-Party Social Dynamics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01724 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01724/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02508/) (2018)
- [ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07143/) (2020)
- [SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11667/) (2023)
- [QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05938/) (2021)
- [Powerset multi-class cross entropy loss for neural speaker diarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13025/) (2023)
- [MediaSum: A Large-scale Media Interview Dataset for Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06410/) (2021)
- [Wespeaker: A Research and Production oriented Speaker Embedding Learning Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17016/) (2022)
- [MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17529/) (2023)
- [TurnGPT: a Transformer-based Language Model for Predicting Turn-taking in Spoken Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10874/) (2020)
- [Multi-Party Chat: Conversational Agents in Group Settings with Humans and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13835/) (2023)
- [Conversation Chronicles: Towards Diverse Temporal and Relational Dynamics in Multi-Session Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13420/) (2023)
- [Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00383/) (2024)
- [Cross-replication Reliability -- An Empirical Approach to Interpreting Inter-rater Reliability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07393/) (2021)
- [DeliData: A dataset for deliberation in multi-party problem solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05271/) (2021)
- [SocialDial: A Benchmark for Socially-Aware Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12026/) (2023)
- [DiPCo -- Dinner Party Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13447/) (2019)
- [DDRel: A New Dataset for Interpersonal Relation Classification in Dyadic Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02553/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good Multi-Party Conversation Solver?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16301/) (2023)
- [Controlling AI Agent Participation in Group Conversations: A Human-Centered Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17258/) (2025)
- [SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00900/) (2025)
- [Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02763/) (2023)
- [You need to MIMIC to get FAME: Solving Meeting Transcript Scarcity with a Multi-Agent Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13001/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Group conversations are fundamental to human collaboration, yet standard large language models (LLMs) still struggle with the complexities of multi-party interaction. This challenge persists in part because existing group conversation datasets are often limited to short-term lab settings with contrived tasks, failing to capture the long-term social dynamics of real-world teams. To bridge this gap, we introduce TIDES, a high-resolution longitudinal dataset tracking 12 university project teams over a full semester. Comprising 75,971 utterances in both English and Korean from in-person meetings, TIDES provides a naturalistic record of teams working on self-managed projects. Our socio-structural annotations-covering interaction types, emergent roles, and development stages-allow for modeling of team evolution over months. Experiments show that fine-tuning on TIDES improves next-speaker prediction by 13.8 percentage points over a bigram baseline (64.53%) and yields performance comparable to strong proprietary zero-shot models. The model also comes within 2.1 percentage points of the published state of the art on the AMI Meeting Corpus while using approximately 42% less training data. However, human evaluations suggest that better next-speaker prediction does not necessarily yield more natural or coherent utterances, as fine-tuned models were generally less preferred than vanilla models. This potential mismatch motivates further study of how structural modeling can support natural multi-party generation.
