# BiCAA: Bidirectional Credit Assignment for Search-Augmented Agent

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01321 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01321/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03533/) (2022)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10978/) (2025)
- [REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03262/) (2025)
- [ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04588/) (2025)
- [ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19470/) (2025)
- [Hindsight Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02503/) (2019)
- [Hindsight Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08754/) (2026)
- [Reinforcing Language Agents via Policy Optimization with Action Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15821/) (2024)
- [Why Multi-Step Tool-Use Reinforcement Learning Collapses and How Supervisory Signals Fix It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26027/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [TIDE: Teacher-Student Transition via Informative Distillation and Exploration for Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35058/) (2026)
- [Beyond Outcome Rewards: Constructing and Assigning Retrieval Credit for Search Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-step search is a fundamental capability for search agents, enabling them to iteratively acquire, refine, and integrate external evidence for complex reasoning QA. However, vanilla GRPO allocates rewards exclusively based on the model's final outputs, yielding outcome-only supervision with no supervisory signals for intermediate reasoning steps. Such sparse supervision easily causes training instability and redundant search behaviors on multi-step search tasks. To mitigate this limitation, we adopt process reward to deliver stepwise supervision signals. For this process reward, we propose two complementary criteria to judge each search step: whether the step yields new evidence to facilitate problem solving, and whether it forms an efficient, pivotal intermediate decision within the overall reasoning trajectory. Building on this insight, we propose BiCAA: a bidirectional credit assignment framework that delivers dense, distinguishing process rewards for search-augmented agents. BiCAA builds bidirectional process rewards by fusing two complementary signals: forward solvability gain and hindsight success criticality. The former quantifies step-wise improvements in answer plausibility, while the latter evaluates each step's necessity for final success via hindsight outcome-based criticality scoring. We modulate and aggregate the two signals and then fuse them with the outcome reward. Experiments on search-augmented QA benchmarks show that BiCAA stabilizes policy optimization, reduces redundant search behavior, and achieves competitive performance.