# Cloud-ScPO: Hidden-State Geometry for Semi-Supervised Preference Optimization in LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01014 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01014/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03827/) (2022)
- [The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06824/) (2023)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03744/) (2024)
- [Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19733/) (2024)
- [V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06457/) (2024)
- [Self-Consistency Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04109/) (2024)
- [Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18248/) (2024)
- [Silence the Judge: Reinforcement Learning with Self-Verifier via Latent Geometric Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08427/) (2026)
- [BERTops: Studying BERT Representations under a Topological Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00953/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference optimization improves mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but reliable chosen-rejected pairs usually require verified answers, human annotations, or external reward models. We investigate whether preference supervision can instead be derived from the model's internal representation geometry in a semi-supervised setting. Our analysis shows that reasoning trajectories generated across different mathematical problems form structured global point clouds in which correct and incorrect trajectories exhibit different geometric organization. Based on this observation, we propose Cloud-ScPO, a topology-guided preference-mining framework that uses a small labeled set to construct multiple correct and incorrect reference Clouds. Each trajectory is represented by a mean-pooled hidden state and scored against connectivity-induced components using a component-level soft k-nearest-neighbor measure averaged across reference banks. We combine this cross-problem Cloud signal with prompt-level self-consistency: self-consistency determines the answer-level preference direction, while Cloud scoring selects concrete trajectories and filters pairs by their score margin. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH-Numeric across four model settings show that Cloud-ScPO consistently improves over ScPO, with gains of up to 4.49% on GSM8K and 4.19% on MATH-Numeric. Pair-level analyses further show that Cloud-ScPO maintains comparable correctness reliability while more effectively separating informative chosen trajectories from incomplete, repetitive, or otherwise low-quality rejected responses.