# AOSpec: Action and Observation Co-Speculation for Low-Latency Agent Serving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00881 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00881/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10774/) (2024)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01840/) (2025)
- [Speculative Actions: A Lossless Framework for Faster Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04371/) (2025)
- [Parallelizing Tool Execution and LLM Generation for Low-Latency Agent Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18897/) (2026)
- [Hardware-Aware Parallel Prompt Decoding for Memory-Efficient Acceleration of LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18628/) (2024)
- [Optimizing Agentic Language Model Inference via Speculative Tool Calls](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15834/) (2025)
- [DualSpec: Accelerating Deep Research Agents via Dual-Process Action Speculation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07416/) (2026)
- [SPORK: Self-Speculative Forking to Accelerate Agentic LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03333/) (2026)
- [SpecHop: Continuous Speculation for Accelerating Multi-Hop Retrieval Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21965/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [TomasuLLM: Out-of-Order Speculative Execution for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38201/) (2026)
- [LEAP: Learning Efficient Action Proposals For LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02670/) (2026)
- [ObsSpec: Accelerating Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Observation Speculation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15246/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model agents increasingly act through stateful tools, yet model generation and environment execution remain serialized at every step. As decoding accelerates, tool execution becomes a growing bottleneck. Existing action- or observation-only speculation leaves much of this latency exposed: value is concentrated in a few slow calls, some outcomes emerge only through execution, and longer lookahead typically requires an increasingly unlikely chain of action predictions. We present AOSpec, a lossless framework that co-speculates actions and observations across the full agent-environment loop. Expected Value Decoding (EVD) directs observation speculation toward outcomes with the greatest expected latency benefit, optimizing expected time hidden rather than hit rate. For outcomes only execution can reveal, AOSpec launches latency-critical target actions in isolated forks that contain their effects, while Joint Action-State Verification (JASV) verifies both the action and its origin state against committed execution before reuse. JASV recasts long-horizon action dependency from full-chain prediction into target action-state verification, breaking the lookahead--accuracy tradeoff and unlocking long-range overlap without sacrificing serial semantics. Across Terminal-Bench serving settings spanning four harnesses, five actor models, and five serving speeds, AOSpec outperforms every practical baseline, reducing mean end-to-end latency by 11.8-32.5% and p99 latency by up to 42.8%. Its gains increase as decoding accelerates, and its observation model transfers from Terminal-Bench to SWE-bench Verified without retraining.
