# Disentangling Visuo-Tactile Foresight: Oracle-Guided Interface Discovery for World Action Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00547 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00547/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Embodied and robot world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/embodied-and-robot-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13705/) (2023)
- [World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15922/) (2026)
- [Fast-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Test-time Future Imagination?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16666/) (2026)
- [ViTacFormer: Learning Cross-Modal Representation for Visuo-Tactile Dexterous Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15953/) (2025)
- [ImageWAM: Do World Action Models Really Need Video Generation, or Just Image Editing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19531/) (2026)
- [OmniVTA: Visuo-Tactile World Modeling for Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19201/) (2026)
- [Visuo-Tactile World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06001/) (2026)
- [OA-WAM: Object-Addressable World Action Model for Robust Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06481/) (2026)
- [Dream-Tac: A Unified Tactile World Action Model for Contact-Rich Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08737/) (2026)
- [Learning to Feel the Future: DreamTacVLA for Contact-Rich Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23864/) (2025)
- [UniVTAC: A Unified Simulation Platform for Visuo-Tactile Manipulation Data Generation, Learning, and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10093/) (2026)
- [TacForeSight: Force-Guided Tactile World Model for Contact-Rich Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11184/) (2026)
- [VT-WAM: Visual-Tactile World Action Model for Contact-Rich Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02503/) (2026)
- [Tactile-WAM: Touch-Aware World Action Model with Tactile Asymmetric Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26663/) (2026)
- [KAM-WM: Kinematic Affordance Maps from Latent World Models for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04652/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Contact-rich manipulation remains challenging because successful control depends on physical interaction cues that are often weakly observable from vision alone. Recent tactile world action models jointly model future visual observations and tactile signals to guide action generation, but how such futures should be structured for effective use by the action expert remains underexplored. Directly studying this question with learned world action models is difficult because end-to-end behavior entangles physically invalid visual futures, unreliable predictions, inaccurate or cross-modally inconsistent tactile forecasts, and an unreadable future-to-action interface. To make this interface independently studyable, we introduce Oracle Visuo-Tactile Foresight (OVTF), a controlled framework that supplies paired RGB and tactile futures from successful trajectories verified in simulation. By fixing the future provider, OVTF isolates the interface and asks a cleaner question: if the future is successful and physically executable, what representation allows the action expert to absorb its benefit? Within OVTF, we propose Asymmetric Phase-Local Future Memory (AFM), in which visual memory reads future vision, each tactile memory jointly attends to its own tactile stream and phase-aligned future vision, and cross-tactile access is blocked. We compare AFM with Modality-Isolated Future Memory (IFM), which removes visual-to-tactile access and processes each future modality independently. Across seven tasks on the UniVTAC simulation benchmark, AFM achieves 32.0% average success, compared with 23.7% for IFM and 14.9% for UniVTAC-ACT. This controlled comparison shows that selective phase-aligned visual-tactile routing provides a more actionable future-to-action bridge than complete modality isolation.