# SERL-SQL: Selective Hindsight Distillation for Text-to-SQL Reinforcement Agentic Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00485 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00485/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15363/) (2023)
- [CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16347/) (2024)
- [CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16755/) (2024)
- [Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25562/) (2026)
- [CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01943/) (2024)
- [OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02240/) (2025)
- [SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08600/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Employing Large Language Models for Text-to-SQL Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15186/) (2024)
- [Reasoning-SQL: Reinforcement Learning with SQL Tailored Partial Rewards for Reasoning-Enhanced Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23157/) (2025)
- [A Preview of XiYan-SQL: A Multi-Generator Ensemble Framework for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.08599/) (2024)
- [Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20315/) (2025)
- [DeepEye-SQL: A Software-Engineering-Inspired Text-to-SQL Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17586/) (2025)
- [Agentar-Scale-SQL: Advancing Text-to-SQL through Orchestrated Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24403/) (2025)
- [MARS-SQL: A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01008/) (2025)
- [What and When to Distill: Selective Hindsight Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19447/) (2026)
- [MTIR-SQL: Multi-turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25510/) (2025)
- [SQL-ASTRA: Alleviating Sparse Feedback in Agentic SQL via Column-Set Matching and Trajectory Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16161/) (2026)
- [TRUST-SQL: Tool-Integrated Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL over Unknown Schemas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16448/) (2026)
- [Every Step Counts: Step-Level Credit Assignment for Tool-Integrated Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04719/) (2026)
- [Progress-SQL: Improving Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL via Progressive Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06825/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Text-to-SQL systems increasingly rely on multi-turn interaction, execution feedback, and reinforcement learning. However, most existing methods use execution correctness only as a trajectory-level reward, which provides limited guidance for identifying the SQL decisions responsible for success or failure. We propose SERL-SQL, a selective execution-grounded reinforcement learning framework for multi-turn Text-to-SQL agents. SERL-SQL samples on-policy SQL interaction trajectories and uses a training-only teacher to re-score student actions with execution feedback. The resulting teacher--student likelihood gap is converted into bounded, masked weights that reweight GRPO advantages only on SQL and tool-action tokens. In this way, task rewards preserve the optimization direction, while execution hindsight provides localized credit assignment. Experiments on BIRD, Spider, and cross-domain benchmarks show that SERL-SQL achieves competitive performance, reaching 76.56% execution accuracy on BIRD-Dev and 89.92% on Spider-Test. Moreover, our reward-based selection strategy closely approaches the oracle Best-of-N upper bound and consistently outperforms consistency-based selection, showing that SERL-SQL produces high-quality candidates that can be reliably identified by lightweight execution-grounded rewards. Our code will be released at https://github.com/Ffunkytao/SERL-SQL.