# Which Modality Decides? Counterfactual Modality Attribution for Multimodal LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00076 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00076/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19647/) (2024)
- [Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00288/) (2021)
- [Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02104/) (2024)
- [MM-SHAP: A Performance-agnostic Metric for Measuring Multimodal Contributions in Vision and Language Models & Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08158/) (2022)
- [Fast Diffusion-Based Counterfactuals for Shortcut Removal and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14223/) (2023)
- [MultiViz: Towards Visualizing and Understanding Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00056/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability for Multi-Modal Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17516/) (2025)
- [Efficient-DLM: From Autoregressive to Diffusion Language Models, and Beyond in Speed](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14067/) (2025)
- [Token Activation Map to Visually Explain Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23270/) (2025)
- [Continuous Diffusion Model for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11564/) (2025)
- [Sparse Visual Counterfactual Explanations in Image Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07972/) (2022)
- [Where MLLMs Attend and What They Rely On: Explaining Autoregressive Token Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22496/) (2025)
- [Omni-Diffusion: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Masked Discrete Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06577/) (2026)
- [DiG-IN: Diffusion Guidance for Investigating Networks -- Uncovering Classifier Differences Neuron Visualisations and Visual Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17833/) (2023)
- [Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11277/) (2025)
- [DatBench: Discriminative, Faithful, and Efficient VLM Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02316/) (2026)
- [Unifying Continuous and Discrete Text Diffusion with Non-simultaneous Diffusion Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22165/) (2025)
- [Guiding LLMs to Generate High-Fidelity and High-Quality Counterfactual Explanations for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04463/) (2025)
- [Back to the Feature: Explaining Video Classifiers with Video Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20295/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Where MLLMs Fail and Why: Causal Task Decomposition for Capability Failure Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38851/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly support high-stakes decision making by combining complementary information from images and text. While existing explainability methods identify influential image regions or text tokens, they cannot answer a fundamental question: which modality drives a prediction? Consequently, a model may produce the correct output while relying on the wrong source of evidence, masking shortcut learning and unsafe reasoning. We formulate modality attribution as a complementary explainability objective for multimodal foundation models and propose Counterfactual Modality Attribution (CMA), the first framework for quantifying modality-level contributions in MLLMs. CMA generates image-only, text-only, and joint multimodal counterfactuals using coupled diffusion priors and converts them into principled modality attribution scores through a cooperative game-theoretic formulation based on Shapley values. We evaluate CMA on controlled synthetic benchmarks with known ground-truth modality reliance and on a real-world multimodal clinical dataset. CMA correctly identifies the decision-driving modality in 98% of controlled cases and consistently outperforms baselines, revealing failures of cross-modal reasoning that remain invisible to predictive accuracy alone. Our results establish modality attribution as a complementary dimension of explainability beyond feature attribution, providing a principled framework for auditing multimodal foundation models in safety-critical applications.
