# AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29626 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29626/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07815/) (2024)
- [Phi-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08905/) (2024)
- [Population Based Training of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09846/) (2017)
- [Agent Lightning: Train ANY AI Agents with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03680/) (2025)
- [Using Large Language Models for Hyperparameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04528/) (2023)
- [ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09835/) (2023)
- [Align Anything: Training All-Modality Models to Follow Instructions with Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15838/) (2024)
- [AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06855/) (2026)
- [Kolmogorov-Arnold Convolutions: Design Principles and Empirical Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01092/) (2024)
- [Sequential Large Language Model-Based Hyper-parameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20302/) (2024)
- [94% on CIFAR-10 in 3.29 Seconds on a Single GPU](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00498/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [EPOCH: Reliable Discovery through Evidence-Governed Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.06986/) (2026)
- [A Closer Look at Agentic BBO: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Black-Box Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12183/) (2026)
- [Prior or Feedback? What an LLM Uses When Adapting Neural Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12325/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As LLMs evolve from code completion systems into autonomous scientific agents, evaluating their ability to conduct experiments has become increasingly important. Existing benchmarks typically focus on static code generation, paper replication, or final answer correctness, but do not directly assess whether agents can interpret experimental evidence and use it to guide subsequent hyperparameter decisions. To address this gap, we introduce AgentHPOBench, a sequential benchmark comprising 30 executable machine learning tasks across seven research categories. Each task begins with a validated baseline run, after which an agent performs several sequential interventions. At each step, the agent observes the accumulated configurations, metrics, and logs before proposing the next valid configuration. We evaluate 12 widely used agents and conventional HPO baselines under a unified protocol. The results show that current agents exhibit measurable experimental optimization ability across domains, but still face clear limitations in sustained iterative refinement, complex log diagnosis, and consistent progress toward reported reference performance.
