# SLIM: Saturation-Aware Lightweight Performance Modeling for LLM Serving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29575 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29575/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Serving systems and request scheduling, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving.
- Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Serving systems and request scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/inference/serving-systems-and-request-scheduling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17192/) (2022)
- [GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13245/) (2023)
- [AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00978/) (2023)
- [Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01318/) (2023)
- [Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02150/) (2019)
- [Efficiently Scaling Transformer Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05102/) (2022)
- [Taming Throughput-Latency Tradeoff in LLM Inference with Sarathi-Serve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02310/) (2024)
- [Llumnix: Dynamic Scheduling for Large Language Model Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03243/) (2024)
- [LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16363/) (2024)
- [Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04324/) (2024)
- [Vidur: A Large-Scale Simulation Framework For LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05465/) (2024)
- [AI and Memory Wall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14123/) (2024)
- [Fairness in Serving Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00588/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Inference Acceleration: A Comprehensive Hardware Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04466/) (2024)
- [Mind the Memory Gap: Unveiling GPU Bottlenecks in Large-Batch LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08311/) (2025)
- [Demystifying AI Platform Design for Distributed Inference of Next-Generation LLM models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01698/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) serving commonly increases batch size to improve throughput, but performance eventually reaches a deployment-dependent plateau beyond which larger batches provide marginal gains while increasing latency and GPU memory consumption. Previous studies have attributed this behavior to HBM/DRAM bandwidth limitations, but the underlying causes have primarily been supported by conceptual arguments or high-level performance observations. As our first contribution, we present a detailed GPU characterization using hardware profiling techniques, demonstrating that throughput saturation originates in the attention kernels during the decode phase. Specifically, we show that their nearly constant arithmetic intensity as active-context lengths increases -not merely larger batch sizes- drives DRAM-bandwidth saturation, while the achieved compute throughput remains far below the hardware limit. Building on this analysis, we present the Batching Configuration Advisor (BCA), which selects the highest-throughput batching configuration satisfying a target latency constraint and identifies up to 55 GB of GPU memory allocation that can be avoided for the evaluated OPT models with minimal throughput loss. To enable these recommendations, we introduce SLIM (Saturation-Aware Lightweight Performance Model), a semi-analytical model that predicts LLM inference throughput and latency from analytical formulations of Transformer computation and memory traffic. Across the evaluated scenarios, SLIM outperforms representative performance-modeling baselines while successfully generalizing to previously unseen operating conditions.